Re: actions related to improving IETF meeting selections
Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Sun, 12 June 2016 18:37 UTC
Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC9B12D51A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 11:37:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U0z2-mvuWqOG for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 11:37:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x230.google.com (mail-lf0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 856DD12D626 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 11:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x230.google.com with SMTP id j7so49044466lfg.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 11:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GdSvmWVtHGxCeIt1l7vkW3q+0d9GC6p1g1Ki+jc2ROk=; b=0T+O+WPqzSnPo6x1sDKu7WR4aAnTzHQWJazn1jc3c9NHlv1y490uQz7926TUP3v1Na H3cnnE53d+bBG5Xw87aTdBVNYSbOPt+h4uxMNzKnkaFhAcm8eO2SetsvRagi7l+/0Y8+ FGRw2sbBWD5MiGq9O0Aa3IhhobAls+naK0Z+7ogTLLSy1Ud6V6J71r11Zjc4Rao/dexC cQ6WabHDN3Dc0xrZWd827CdYQagtOxn2vONC9jQRwQT0uKiYS8hlTEyR22msmg0564ax cq9Akskbnrd+Piegi+0Hd7GiYBJA6v6iUcKzSr6lwLrrp3187L6/5q9UICsRrAZQK2Jq iTzw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GdSvmWVtHGxCeIt1l7vkW3q+0d9GC6p1g1Ki+jc2ROk=; b=YBOwURiDeeA21Xx5CmahTbuzQpnyEHI6QBcI6/wmqHcxJZfV5/1JRdQXuhRpzjABTQ iEAXeo/AcumtdlPVQM3Ua1svJDPr8DFnBH3QIIXlbh/2gHx2ywnjYq+7+hwy6FYD7Dy6 NrEhb9GBkH3z7H5SNkTnDY+AqyuFJpLvhlcJT19EbyvR4Hsad2gB9ycnm/jgD00sCJ5V 358/PMcUT5FODdZZiBeJ7itdo/eHklHfEaVhyl20dmTBf+i1a/BWTZgVFkGBO4dJADuR jN403zibVUmEdr/O6mx1X4nKaiReKu4DdhDWinIBrEMyc7yUKns8mypGqxi8jv5+BRFQ EcmQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJCZym437z5h7GtqyxEr3thvnZZ1YPOiIf32bCV1WmDHal2sFtMk8uB9s5HyLg5xISQ0j7bgdMp2nb4Eg==
X-Received: by 10.25.207.1 with SMTP id f1mr2383530lfg.39.1465756635668; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 11:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.153.135 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 11:36:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <312eb527-e0f0-d26f-b653-bcd0a24d8915@gmail.com>
References: <0DAA04D6-03FE-444D-ABF9-4A1CF2F7DFC9@ietf.org> <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B927CA81040@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <557685565.1303569.1465745474144.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <CAPt1N1nqg9nbkgUGq2GSe7_Pu36aFx8WvX6KopZ0N9Ot9n-ceQ@mail.gmail.com> <312eb527-e0f0-d26f-b653-bcd0a24d8915@gmail.com>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 14:36:35 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1=Sg6Usxo61McuJnH4v8jPOxy85EjLyqxYtPdwuJ6Kdgw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: actions related to improving IETF meeting selections
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11417df898b7c50535190f2d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/PNSFLz2Mj1BnyHWQTJ0Io8RgX3w>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 18:37:21 -0000
Yes, there would have to be work to do. On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> wrote: > On 6/12/16 10:06 AM, Ted Lemon wrote: > >> This is a great idea, but would require a lot of regular IETFers to sign >> on and get support for going to those meetings. >> > > I'm not sure it's a great idea. IETF meetings are working > meetings, not conferences, and I'm not sure that having > additional meetings for people who are not active contributors > without the presence of chairs and document editors is going > to be productive, either in terms of the primary goal of > moving documents along or in terms of a secondary goal > of broadening the participant base. > > Melinda > >
- actions related to improving IETF meeting selecti… IETF Chair
- RE: actions related to improving IETF meeting sel… Sheng Jiang
- Re: actions related to improving IETF meeting sel… nalini.elkins
- Re: actions related to improving IETF meeting sel… Ted Lemon
- Re: actions related to improving IETF meeting sel… Melinda Shore
- Re: actions related to improving IETF meeting sel… Ted Lemon
- Re: actions related to improving IETF meeting sel… nalini.elkins
- RE: actions related to improving IETF meeting sel… Sheng Jiang
- Re: actions related to improving IETF meeting sel… Melinda Shore
- RE: actions related to improving IETF meeting sel… Sheng Jiang