Re: 2606bis

Bill Fenner <fenner@gmail.com> Wed, 19 October 2005 21:40 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ESLfM-0006Bb-Hs; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:40:08 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ESLfJ-00063B-Cn for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:40:05 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA05828 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:39:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from qproxy.gmail.com ([72.14.204.199]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ESLr7-0000Fq-39 for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:52:18 -0400
Received: by qproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o12so196784qba for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 14:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=kVCjI/wG0/Cog3vcHzG7HK8rMa/z90Px4vd/1CG5mD1kzuut5c0I5T+Qmf0TY6xw7KKSJBFLWgLbZq7V5dZKkSq2Bgl+rmNCAooKLSQeKfFVfA33xtOYL5M7OSHSVIUSxVApEtKAA5Dq2Zz44y/g9eo3Wdh5+BapLswCld0Zx/k=
Received: by 10.64.232.15 with SMTP id e15mr860552qbh; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 14:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.195.3 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 14:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <ed6d469d0510191440u45a70950ve074ee12ab637cb3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 14:40:03 -0700
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@gmail.com>
To: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
In-Reply-To: <435697F6.3014@xyzzy.claranet.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0509191647510.23762@internaut.com> <p0620074fbf5509dd070a@192.168.2.2> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0509192043550.28535@internaut.com> <4333DDFF.8020909@zurich.ibm.com> <4333F545.7619@xyzzy.claranet.de> <4355E8A4.7634@xyzzy.claranet.de> <C56AABD8019A5267529A992C@scan.jck.com> <435697F6.3014@xyzzy.claranet.de>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 08e48e05374109708c00c6208b534009
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: 2606bis
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On 10/19/05, Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> wrote:
>... to see a big red blinking WAIT
> for each normative reference to an informational RfC.

Not if the RFC 3967 procedure is followed ("Clarifying when Standards
Track Documents may Refer Normatively to Documents at a Lower Level.")

  Bill

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf