Re: StandICT.eu funding on offer

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Fri, 07 May 2021 23:49 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DD7E3A38E3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 May 2021 16:49:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1BPIYm__vE8f for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 May 2021 16:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFF343A38E1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 May 2021 16:49:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.116.12.137]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 147NmtsF027999 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 7 May 2021 16:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1620431347; x=1620517747; i=@elandsys.com; bh=bAb6f0HdWAAwqx1N96knHhkBi2FGsQf1Z5arPr2Mn7U=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=NtfNgYn18EUJz3/pZKbdKBxt3xNnHmIiLUbL1iw3iCw4EdtKwSRYIVlc98D0eEc6Q ribj4Zv5G5Plz9tbVVrgVQALztq21ZcdNLE+rkrF13H4z1HfAvvh0Yyhzv1eD4EqMW n9yt2hePfXTcd+eelR/G0AeoWEeRq3hhQBkGzjho=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20210507162537.1757f618@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 16:48:04 -0700
To: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>, ietf@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: StandICT.eu funding on offer
In-Reply-To: <B7D400A7-C9BF-44C8-A864-C18A3818C235@episteme.net>
References: <412FE537-426A-4517-946A-B6F6A532F1B1@ietf.org> <907375A7-DCCE-4972-ACA9-D2C611BFCAB6@ietf.org> <CAA=duU1oyB6Ut17ECZweC1_NFx=Yj+okobxPPjW=zT8PobuqdQ@mail.gmail.com> <B7D400A7-C9BF-44C8-A864-C18A3818C235@episteme.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/RydXF-x1SyrGfwqmRi7b5YHTooM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 23:49:23 -0000

Hi Pete,
At 08:26 AM 07-05-2021, Pete Resnick wrote:
>But it doesn't fit the IETF list charter, RFC 3005:
>
>Inappropriate postings include:
>
>- Announcements of conferences, events, or activities that are not
>   sponsored or endorsed by the Internet Society or IETF.
>
>I'm not saying that we can't decide to allow postings like this; it 
>might be a very good thing. But we need to explicitly make that 
>decision, and explain why this one is OK and other similar posts 
>might still be problematic (if so).

Please see 
https://2023.standict.eu/standard-repository/ietf-rfc7973-assignment-ethertype-ipv6-low-power-wireless-personal-area-0 
It is debatable whether the sentence from the mailing list charter 
applies in this case.

The burden is on the person complaining about a message to explain 
why it is not okay.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy