Re: StandICT.eu funding on offer

Amelia Andersdotter <amelia.ietf@andersdotter.cc> Sat, 08 May 2021 11:16 UTC

Return-Path: <amelia.ietf@andersdotter.cc>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903083A0E21 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 May 2021 04:16:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j18Iv1SbvAQ4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 May 2021 04:16:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (relay1-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 377F93A0E22 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 May 2021 04:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: 188.44.92.110
Received: from [192.168.1.245] (unknown [188.44.92.110]) (Authenticated sender: amelia@andersdotter.cc) by relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AEA85240002 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 May 2021 11:16:46 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: StandICT.eu funding on offer
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <412FE537-426A-4517-946A-B6F6A532F1B1@ietf.org> <907375A7-DCCE-4972-ACA9-D2C611BFCAB6@ietf.org> <CAA=duU1oyB6Ut17ECZweC1_NFx=Yj+okobxPPjW=zT8PobuqdQ@mail.gmail.com> <B7D400A7-C9BF-44C8-A864-C18A3818C235@episteme.net> <100CE9CF386142B15AD8098A@PSB>
Reply-To: amelia.ietf@andersdotter.cc
From: Amelia Andersdotter <amelia.ietf@andersdotter.cc>
Message-ID: <fc52e4d3-fdb9-c0ab-2c5b-3011e66609ce@andersdotter.cc>
Date: Sat, 8 May 2021 13:16:55 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <100CE9CF386142B15AD8098A@PSB>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/VEb_j3371PJdT5bg4S5gCkuvxHY>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 May 2021 11:16:57 -0000

On 5/7/21 6:53 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
>
> --On Friday, May 7, 2021 10:26 -0500 Pete Resnick
> <resnick@episteme.net> wrote:
>
>> On 7 May 2021, at 10:14, Andrew G. Malis wrote:
>>
>>> I disagree about the charter call. The mailman description
>>> for the  general IETF list is "This mailing list is for
>>> general topics of  discussion relating to items within the
>>> IETF community. This is a  public list for the IETF community
>>> to use. Any items posted are  subject to the rules of BCP 78
>>> and BCP 79." This posting certainly  fits that
>>> description, it's very much of interest to the community.
>> But it doesn't fit the IETF list charter, RFC 3005:
>>
>>       Inappropriate postings include:
>>
>>       - Announcements of conferences, events, or activities
>> that are not
>>         sponsored or endorsed by the Internet Society or IETF.
>>
>> I'm not saying that we can't decide to allow postings like
>> this; it might be a very good thing. But we need to explicitly
>> make that decision, and explain why this one is OK and other
>> similar posts might still be problematic (if so).
> FWIW, I concur with Pete.
> If the "real" criterion is going to be "well, I think that is
> interesting and/or helpful or "the ExecDir gets to post these
> things but ordinary mortals do not"..

I disagree with the two interventions above based on RFC3005: "The IETF 
discussion list, ietf@ietf.org, /.../ is the most general IETF mailing 
list, [where] considerable latitude is allowed."

A short, one-sentence message from the IETF executive director outlining 
an opportunity to fund participation in IETF meetings must reasonably 
fit within "considerable latitude".

-- 
^\...~...~...~...~...~.../^
Amelia Andersdotter
IETF SHMOO WG Co-Chair
https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/shmoo/about/

Director of Strategic Initiatives, CENTR
www.centr.org
^\...~...~...~...~...~.../^