Re: Last Call: Correct classification of RFC 20 (ASCII format) to Internet Standard
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 08 December 2014 20:24 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87B71ACD1F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:24:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2y-q3zJerTml for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:24:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 142F51AC3F8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:24:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.201.11]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sB8KO8uW009009 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 21:24:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [IPv6:2002:5489:a14::dc22:665d:d588:8dbc] (unknown [IPv6:2002:5489:a14:0:dc22:665d:d588:8dbc]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3jxGFh4bKHz4vb2; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 21:24:08 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
Subject: Re: Last Call: Correct classification of RFC 20 (ASCII format) to Internet Standard
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <20141208190010.4602.98767.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 21:24:07 +0100
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 439763047.52102-6f8a60e1fb66d486cf1abe3cca649b08
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <687CE75E-662E-4CAB-B610-359FE2A99464@tzi.org>
References: <20141208190010.4602.98767.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Sl98EjKH_DaCfxC3LoEq33cZmtQ
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 20:24:13 -0000
On 08 Dec 2014, at 20:00, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote: > > - RFC20 from Unknown to Internet Standard > (ASCII format for network interchange) I have read this RFC and an uncountable of documents based on the work reported there. I believe it has aged very well and (despite a few typos in the reconstituted version*) deserves to be formally recognized as the Internet Standard that it actually is. Grüße, Carsten *) Reissuing it under a new number to fix those doesn’t sound right.
- Re: Last Call: Correct classification of RFC 20 (… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call: Correct classification of RFC 20 (… Tony Hansen
- Re: Last Call: Correct classification of RFC 20 (… Hector Santos
- Re: Last Call: Correct classification of RFC 20 (… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Last Call: Correct classification of RFC 20 (… Carsten Bormann
- Re: Last Call: Correct classification of RFC 20 (… Måns Nilsson
- Re: Last Call: Correct classification of RFC 20 (… Eric Burger
- Re: Last Call: Correct classification of RFC 20 (… Carsten Bormann