Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Mon, 08 December 2014 20:23 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 344F11ACD1F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:23:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qgQueUlFj6-o for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:23:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22d.google.com (mail-pd0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FD9E1AC3F8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:23:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pd0-f173.google.com with SMTP id ft15so5796593pdb.32 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 12:23:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/883j+pp414ACQeinWFgh2aMZSnm6WkthD6KydMDdbY=; b=mOPxZfYi8AORB6YwZnaWepRGCRdg9/VblVmdwQO5jgbPgPVvzzlxtZEVqXhXZ8FGTM y1vKjdE2VfXHIsNeyBPcEZHDyVWSCSHl+LESrEGTyXrqAtY6HhqUsqLx+89COTrbtgtt vEoTEilQzpsK3SeNHnncIlj+vSbxMccOtT8xg+b5N1XpUSCyZ5kC8u5vRtD4f6jWxl7q UDkKEC/bOMpM73lsWaHaW+MHHQnvSPnBvg7e+g5AD3GhVVvbqIM1BgoV2MljsyVOTMwF OsCEbVOboZnczUS756wDU2FuL7L6OUakbP7SQsl19et+df3R4kaVkrkaMLJBXI/64cqR DTyw==
X-Received: by 10.68.232.104 with SMTP id tn8mr18963108pbc.31.1418070195416; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 12:23:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spandex.local (216-67-120-90.dynamic.cdma.acsalaska.net. [216.67.120.90]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id he1sm16234673pac.29.2014.12.08.12.23.14 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Dec 2014 12:23:14 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <548608B0.5090100@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 11:23:12 -0900
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
References: <20140612132656.8100.57197.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL0qLwZEo-AN4Er0gmbCyWJwTqOKBUKKMHEMQ_YqhK+oB+pcgg@mail.gmail.com> <547E9DBA.9040703@pi.nu> <0c1001d00ee9$36598670$a30c9350$@olddog.co.uk> <D51141636F7AC8CBFE11FA93@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <547F23AD.90206@gmail.com> <F1301BDF5BA91E9561C6654C@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <0c7901d00f12$f6790a60$e36b1f20$@olddog.co.uk> <547F37C7.6030207@gmail.com> <0cbf01d00f1f$853f10d0$8fbd3270$@olddog.co.uk> <547F4CF2.9020707@gmail.com> <m261dnje1v.wl%randy@psg.com> <9DD12708-7020-4F59-9A58-40A74E9E96FA@gmail.com> <54860203.4050906@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <54860203.4050906@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/GCD5lTqo8Wpi2Q25InLzpo8EM10
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 20:23:18 -0000

On 12/8/14 10:54 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> More generally, it needs to be clear that chairs MAY delegate
> their routine tasks as they see fit, including these tasks,
> but that doing so does not absolve them from any of their
> responsibilities. 

That strikes me as the correct formulation.

Melinda