IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice

Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com> Wed, 03 December 2014 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <eburger@standardstrack.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2280A1A903C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 10:31:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3Gb1Oqda3YVn for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 10:31:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from biz104.inmotionhosting.com (biz104.inmotionhosting.com [173.247.246.244]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85B0B1A8AE6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 10:31:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=standardstrack.com; s=default; h=In-Reply-To:To:References:Date:Subject:Mime-Version:Message-Id:Content-Type:From; bh=j9MKmOAd9MM+vSamKJ3ZKgfvNsIft04VRbPK6e4/ryA=; b=QNkYJegs9iS2stweX6ft1+Eg+PaQjJQhPcQNph75oNLHMHDe+Kp6rWa9XqZlc9CQNmtrP2HyPQR7n36hIaqdSGPrFMEc9xqz8JFsPvrQeDiNAP4D7T7OdPdd0O40Ejrv8xM6r9Fqdpk4X1I+GY2xHrZT6ZiUJ+m+SHB5nQ6jz7s=;
Received: from ip68-100-74-115.dc.dc.cox.net ([68.100.74.115]:64279 helo=[192.168.15.119]) by biz104.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eburger@standardstrack.com>) id 1XwEht-0003gs-2C for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 10:31:23 -0800
From: Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8AFBDFF5-D317-43F6-83EC-9A0619D65C1D"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
Message-Id: <68C5E2E2-B8D2-4242-87FC-473C775DDEC3@standardstrack.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 13:31:19 -0500
References: <20140612132656.8100.57197.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL0qLwZEo-AN4Er0gmbCyWJwTqOKBUKKMHEMQ_YqhK+oB+pcgg@mail.gmail.com> <547E9DBA.9040703@pi.nu> <0c1001d00ee9$36598670$a30c9350$@olddog.co.uk> <D51141636F7AC8CBFE11FA93@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <547F23AD.90206@gmail.com> <F1301BDF5BA91E9561C6654C@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <0c7901d00f12$f6790a60$e36b1f20$@olddog.co.uk> <547F37C7.6030207@gmail.com> <0cbf01d00f1f$853f10d0$8fbd3270$@olddog.co.uk> <547F4CF2.9020707@gmail.com>
To: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <547F4CF2.9020707@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - biz104.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - standardstrack.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: biz104.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: eburger+standardstrack.com/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/GsG9bhQycSdkIHhqSYVM9wzmnF8
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 18:31:39 -0000

Do we need to have the document to open the tracker to WG Secretary use? I would hope not, which means we do not need this document as it stands.

> On Dec 3, 2014, at 12:48 PM, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 12/3/14 8:35 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
>> So it should be possible to reach agreement on text changes that would take this
>> tone out of your reading.
> 
> I actually do not think that it should be published at all, as
> I don't think it solves any problem that the IETF is currently
> experiencing and I tend to think that it might lead to further
> ossification of the organization.  That is to say, I think
> that the cost/benefit balance does not work out in favor of
> publication.
> 
> Melinda
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email