IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Mon, 08 December 2014 20:37 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A01181ACE3E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:37:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SZtA47ZqsiWS for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:37:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22a.google.com (mail-wg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EE3F1ACE3C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:37:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id z12so7218555wgg.15 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 12:37:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=WdcxjSflQYX8/GM8ddvm4Dio/vgyzecLpO54GKPokjA=; b=G9N4ApihtNvVXZuUbj8zowb5G01VV+XQ97722mZ0nrwcmFwY0gAffdYZPAlizQd54+ xDfTEnIoe+SonUaJgtGWMB1dXW9U9eKgaPKwxICrk9DntpmelV4JKVB+V8rT1FugpQTH xoMyeSzdgpRPYCgBLi8UoLObBqtXzqiWpTLgcaiEMwNOIgazYypIKMCkd80KVQsTdqs3 NCM4h3Hvp/DgMN8seiOnrp1lzV05mMBRSGbi+P/jJV2gSq4dpCarAAGdl+AyA+IgO7I+ frlDpiYlWXNMXdfsNWEDKWXYUJ+m2/HH7f/JkvDjfQoyp7G7J0XdF8CdDj+JQAVP6q2h CUVg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.211.201 with SMTP id ne9mr26347517wic.30.1418071052900; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 12:37:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.27.76.134 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:37:32 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <548608B0.5090100@gmail.com>
References: <20140612132656.8100.57197.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL0qLwZEo-AN4Er0gmbCyWJwTqOKBUKKMHEMQ_YqhK+oB+pcgg@mail.gmail.com> <547E9DBA.9040703@pi.nu> <0c1001d00ee9$36598670$a30c9350$@olddog.co.uk> <D51141636F7AC8CBFE11FA93@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <547F23AD.90206@gmail.com> <F1301BDF5BA91E9561C6654C@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <0c7901d00f12$f6790a60$e36b1f20$@olddog.co.uk> <547F37C7.6030207@gmail.com> <0cbf01d00f1f$853f10d0$8fbd3270$@olddog.co.uk> <547F4CF2.9020707@gmail.com> <m261dnje1v.wl%randy@psg.com> <9DD12708-7020-4F59-9A58-40A74E9E96FA@gmail.com> <54860203.4050906@gmail.com> <548608B0.5090100@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 12:37:32 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbjEZ779+kyokZ3ojBt5Uq7M+y__3CX1FXdszbJ3Ck5Ww@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c266d65fe0e10509ba6574"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/8XQ86vK1kMg3kyQrmTE30hbioGA
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 20:37:35 -0000

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 12/8/14 10:54 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > More generally, it needs to be clear that chairs MAY delegate
> > their routine tasks as they see fit, including these tasks,
> > but that doing so does not absolve them from any of their
> > responsibilities.
>
> That strikes me as the correct formulation.


Ditto.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email