RE: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Wed, 03 December 2014 11:06 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09FB91A1A40 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 03:06:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FfzBu1dcxWie for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 03:06:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (asmtp4.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F6C81A1A3E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 03:06:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id sB3B6h5b013571; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 11:06:43 GMT
Received: from 950129200 (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id sB3B6fhi013551 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 3 Dec 2014 11:06:42 GMT
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Loa Andersson' <loa@pi.nu>, "'Murray S. Kucherawy'" <superuser@gmail.com>
References: <20140612132656.8100.57197.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL0qLwZEo-AN4Er0gmbCyWJwTqOKBUKKMHEMQ_YqhK+oB+pcgg@mail.gmail.com> <547E9DBA.9040703@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <547E9DBA.9040703@pi.nu>
Subject: RE: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 11:06:37 -0000
Message-ID: <0c1001d00ee9$36598670$a30c9350$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIDrSy+BS7nGKTH8AB3jI0uaBTw3wHfUf3eAfnYkx+b963KoA==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1576-7.5.0.1018-21146.006
X-TM-AS-Result: No--21.007-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--21.007-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: eVEkOcJu0F4zx9GDMr0HvzYTypjB3iDVuikHZcC6ceA/vgFpaLdKGyK9 8Qsbwk3XJMbYAalnkPyI6Z3plNzm0lFYk57DHL9lVoDlQpf4TdUZKp0SZ4P+dZECE4h3e8SVy13 I2jV44t0EKMflvZoh1+Kx1hBR/cO58fXsZfWEfGThqJ6oLOc8QTUb/dhGoRHB0mAM2eipqlquK7 W9djMy7Vga2lARIIAIwg7OQywnrt5FpJi4RaYInlz+axQLnAVBC/ExpXrHizwqNag3uuW+4uLog 540bQq9eez+ExTQSgftcm33Aw3lM/5KWw2IVB4zjoyKzEmtrEdzRfYHMonor2jliw+xvItd6LzG pN5JQIRaU8k77jgcJ/2yCkhDWO8ikfRhdidsajODGx/OQ1GV8t0H8LFZNFG7JQhrLH5KSJ0=
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/uiMElEw2WjmW7XRJFXQkVXk7Vfk
Cc: 'ietf' <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 11:06:49 -0000

> > The document makes reference to several tools or components of tools
> > (the datatracker in particular) that I've never seen.  That's not to say
> > they don't exist, but I haven't seen them and couldn't find them just
> > now, so it makes me wonder if the tools team would have to do a bunch of
> > work to get reality to match what's written here.  For example, I just
> > went into the datatracker and as a working group co-chair I have
> > privileges in that system with respect to my working groups.  However, I
> > didn't see anywhere in there that I can declare a WG Secretary or
> > delegate some or all of my powers to that person, despite the fact that
> > Section 4 says such things "shall" be done.  Is this something that a
> > co-chair would have to request of the Secretariat directly or via a
> > sponsoring Area Director?  If not, does the tools team intend to add that?
> 
> Well - the tool team has to answer about their plans, but does hardly
> effect progressing this document.
> 
> Things like "delegation" are captured in the datatracker, and that is
> what the document says: a lot of things are, some of them can only be
> done by intervention of an AD or the Secreatariat or a combination
> thereof. This document is not the place to describe the dynamics.

As AD I can see the place to make these changes in the data tracker. It's possible that the permissions are not set to allow chairs to make these changes.

datatracker
sign in
https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/foowg/charter/
"Edit group"  <<< possibly this you don't have access to as a chair?
fill in the fields

Adrian