IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Multihoming Issues

"Jim Fleming" <JimFleming@ameritech.net> Wed, 04 September 2002 09:05 UTC

Received: from loki.ietf.org (loki [10.27.2.29]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA20946; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 05:05:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from adm@localhost) by loki.ietf.org (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) id EAA22865 for ietf-outbound.09@loki.ietf.org; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 04:44:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [10.27.2.28]) by loki.ietf.org (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA22836 for <ietf-mainout@loki.ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 04:41:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) id EAA20549 for ietf-mainout@loki.ietf.org; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 04:39:52 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: ietf.org: majordom set sender to owner-ietf@ietf.org using -f
Received: from mailhost.chi1.ameritech.net (mailhost1-chcgil.chcgil.ameritech.net [206.141.192.67]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA20545 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 04:39:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from repligate ([67.36.176.153]) by mailhost.chi1.ameritech.net (InterMail vM.4.01.02.17 201-229-119) with SMTP id <20020904084123.HNRU18992.mailhost.chi1.ameritech.net@repligate>; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 03:41:23 -0500
Message-ID: <007101c253ee$dec13100$8c56fea9@repligate>
From: Jim Fleming <JimFleming@ameritech.net>
To: Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>, Caitlin Bestler <caitlinb@RP.ASOMI.NET>
Cc: Christian Huitema <huitema@windows.microsoft.com>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <r01050300-1015-B4A10826BFA211D6B973003065D48EE0@[192.168.0.2]> <3358.1031123759@munnari.OZ.AU>
Subject: Re: Multihoming Issues
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2002 03:41:31 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Loop: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Robert Elz" <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>
> 
>   | Lastly, I am NOT advocating any change. I merely responded
>   | to an implication that there was no justification for
>   | handling DNS for IPV6 differently than for IPv4.
> 
> There should have been, we should be doing A6 for IPv6, that would
> have made lots of sense.
> 

IPv6 and A6 go together....they were made for each other...
...you might want to check with the ICANN Board or the .AU people for more info...

AAAA is for 128-bit DNS users, and does not imply IPv6...
...as an example....2002:* AAAA records cause IPv4 packets to be produced...

Jim Fleming
2002:[IPv4]:000X:03DB:...IPv8 is closer than you think...
http://ipv8.dyndns.tv
http://ipv8.yi.org
http://ipv8.dyns.cx
http://ipv8.no-ip.com
http://ipv8.no-ip.org
http://ipv8.no-ip.biz
http://ipv8.no-ip.info
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email