IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Multihoming Issues

"Michel Py" <michel@ARNEILL-PY.SACRAMENTO.CA.US> Mon, 02 September 2002 22:06 UTC

Received: from loki.ietf.org (loki [10.27.2.29]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA01919; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 18:06:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from adm@localhost) by loki.ietf.org (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) id SAA28053 for ietf-outbound.10@loki.ietf.org; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 18:04:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [10.27.2.28]) by loki.ietf.org (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA28026 for <ietf-mainout@loki.ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 18:02:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) id SAA01842 for ietf-mainout@loki.ietf.org; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 18:00:39 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: ietf.org: majordom set sender to owner-ietf@ietf.org using -f
Received: from server2000.arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us (adsl-209-233-126-65.dsl.scrm01.pacbell.net [209.233.126.65]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA01832 for <ietf@IETF.ORG>; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 18:00:27 -0400 (EDT)
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: Multihoming Issues
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 15:01:30 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
Message-ID: <2B81403386729140A3A899A8B39B04640BD057@server2000>
Thread-Topic: Multihoming Issues
Thread-Index: AcJR7xbgTqt1VGWET+aUBLQ71czjZAA3O7QA
From: Michel Py <michel@ARNEILL-PY.SACRAMENTO.CA.US>
To: Caitlin Bestler <caitlinb@rp.asomi.net>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ietf.org id SAA01833
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Loop: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

> Caitlin Bestler wrote:
> IPv4 is silent on how the lower portion is formed. IPv6
> describes two techniques. Under IPv4 there is no reason
> to presume that the same host will have the same network
> identifier on multiple networks (other than the desire
> of some network administrators to maintain some shred of
> sanity). The method of generating the interface ID under
> IPv6 would appear to be independent of the number of
> identities that the network itself has.

I still fail to see the relation with DNS. What is the point you are
trying to make here?

Michel.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email