IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Multihoming Issues

"Jim Fleming" <JimFleming@ameritech.net> Fri, 06 September 2002 06:28 UTC

Received: from loki.ietf.org (loki [10.27.2.29]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA26709; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 02:28:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from adm@localhost) by loki.ietf.org (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) id CAA08117 for ietf-outbound.10@loki.ietf.org; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 02:30:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [10.27.2.28]) by loki.ietf.org (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA08091 for <ietf-mainout@loki.ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 02:28:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) id CAA26702 for ietf-mainout@loki.ietf.org; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 02:26:40 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: ietf.org: majordom set sender to owner-ietf@ietf.org using -f
Received: from mail1-0.chcgil.ameritech.net (mail1-0.chcgil.ameritech.net [206.141.192.68]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA26698 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 02:26:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from repligate ([64.108.202.122]) by mail1-0.chcgil.ameritech.net (InterMail vM.4.01.02.17 201-229-119) with SMTP id <20020906062812.SVAK11881.mail1-0.chcgil.ameritech.net@repligate>; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 01:28:12 -0500
Message-ID: <03e601c2556e$9e7f94c0$8c56fea9@repligate>
From: Jim Fleming <JimFleming@ameritech.net>
To: Caitlin Bestler <caitlinb@RP.ASOMI.NET>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <r01050300-1015-DA30030CC04E11D6AFB0003065D48EE0@[192.168.0.2]>
Subject: Re: Multihoming Issues
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 01:28:30 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Loop: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

----- Original Message -----
From: "Caitlin Bestler" <caitlinb@RP.ASOMI.NET>
To: <ietf@ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: Multihoming Issues


> On 9/4/02, Jim Fleming wrote:
>
> >From: "Brian E Carpenter" <brian@hursley.ibm.com>
> >> Could we switch this thread to where it belongs (the
> >> multi6 WG)?
> >=============================
> >
> >Would it not be more appropriate on an IPv6-based network ?
> >Why would IPv4 users (here) care about A6 ?
> >
>
> Does that mean that you believe "IPv8" should only be
> discussed on "IPv8" networks?
>

IPv8 is just IPv4 in the hands of someone with a clue...

IPv6 is a good resume builder...look at all the money being wasted on it...
By the way....IPv6 continues to crash...
http://www.iht.com/articles/69229.html
PARIS Europe's bold hopes for third-generation mobile-phone services have come crashing down to earth. By one estimate, perhaps half
of the licenses that West European companies bought two years ago for fast networks will never be used - meaning $50 billion will
have been spent for nothing."
================================

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email