IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: question: are the various IETF web sites IPv6 enabled? If not, why not?

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 09 March 2021 02:41 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B2143A0A3F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 18:41:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8cGJJl5KsJ8N for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 18:41:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x430.google.com (mail-pf1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::430]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D10DF3A0A3E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 18:41:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x430.google.com with SMTP id y67so8542495pfb.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 18:41:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=B/ljI/C9rY/+duW2RubF28IY7af4RwID4amX7OHYIbo=; b=Iml9Hqd03BXSeX/AkJqwQ0fH1SbcNrelrtSxZbwZiXgaq3xlnHYsOxBgBWJQz5n+T9 ffOm1vgack6f+yURqcjTG3Ap+GywPrIMCffODU6RIiOJSpDU7yLOetAMujOVnwn1TRlm O2U9UST/Kzt9V9VNJD2anX+C73aQtLRWhvzgahtdy629sVsr5ZbTZ+SOcuflRi8SicS/ xSWurHp6CZGzxqBTeEU5UCnlXilRk69+gxq0d323vmsVimmxSDYbkI98KS1vWIywcxdK 6AYIrTuF064Riph+CfMQ1y79qQeP6sRKlV7O81+yHMkpq1Xw4z3nu1yMI5F56DQfksHq GGWw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=B/ljI/C9rY/+duW2RubF28IY7af4RwID4amX7OHYIbo=; b=XgJAXdD7++TnIPg8kyE81WKf9H3y4FvTjxaz/iKanKcpXdcM2lXMNXmCXNW+0Lv+2p mrLCOU5/Vf1yBt3VwzXgGmoKr+v/297ImRv/qHMBSbwAnGXgmKiBpxa4A/AUqtL7VAP9 5HFUQ3uqR6ZhLj6L9E5X1dsxfdGR5emEC8BfcCjaMCWZfCaAL/ouDrh6/LHW8/1HNgwa wHT+lvlNuGn4bs5X+xZL3zUVorvHidI5VqiBbMPEoqHofUgP+YMSzeBwjDXVczpcY1vJ OGwWE7Oxg2Ucq/+UZSYdejaFlTR93GxsnEg8i7rVH5kbGEJfcvNaxYN1rysJpHDZ2uT+ Fkow==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530AR5PycnNI4pLkPop6rutyU42Ai66WaHOQDXypJkEyz2MJ5z0R eHYgfbTBdrig/DKio5/3paU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyOzbkxmYpUhnoKwhIW398RIXt3AxkqhdoV9t75XzFzssCk0RbSPiqb+XbdP9Q0urg6T5t3ww==
X-Received: by 2002:a65:6289:: with SMTP id f9mr22258553pgv.373.1615257695765; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 18:41:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2600:8802:5800:567::1003]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c12sm12508475pfp.17.2021.03.08.18.41.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Mar 2021 18:41:35 -0800 (PST)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Fred Baker <FredBaker.IETF@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-ECF2125E-52F6-4E11-9278-50D2E40F5239"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: question: are the various IETF web sites IPv6 enabled? If not, why not?
In-Reply-To: <E6A1C61CFBA23B449020E298B04EBF50151468D9@UMECHPA7F.easf.csd.disa.mil>
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 18:41:34 -0800
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Message-Id: <4CC47F19-3063-430F-8378-B00EB7E2708F@gmail.com>
References: <E6A1C61CFBA23B449020E298B04EBF50151468D9@UMECHPA7F.easf.csd.disa.mil>
To: "Baird, John M CTR OSD HPCMP (USA)" <john.m.baird10.ctr=40mail.mil@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18E5164h)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/TwGvHWOfY8rmL6JbIXE7O9DzJ8c>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 02:41:40 -0000

It is my understanding that they all are, and have been for some time. I might suggest that you ping6 (or ping -6 depending on your OS) to see whether you get a response.

Sent using a machine that autocorrects in interesting ways...

> On Mar 8, 2021, at 6:34 PM, Baird, John M CTR OSD HPCMP (USA) <john.m.baird10.ctr=40mail.mil@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> I apologize in advance if this question has already been discussed ad naseum, and would appreciate pointers to previous discussions of this topic.
>  
> John Baird
> 619-212-2573
> Office: San Diego, CA
> ASRC Federal Data Networx, LLC | Purpose Driven. Enduring Commitment.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email