Re: Last Call: <draft-yevstifeyev-disclosure-relation-00.txt> (The 'disclosure' Link Relation Type) to Informational RFC

[Julian Reschke <[e-mail]>]

On 2011-12-27 07:52, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to seek consensus on separating the semantics of link
> relation for separate disclosure and a list thereof, correspondingly
> defining two link relations - 'disclosure' and 'disclosure-list'.  You
> may see my edits made to Section 2 of the doc. below, which I'm
> proposing:
>
> 2. 'disclosure' Link Relation Type
>
>     Whenever the 'disclosure' relation is defined, the target IRI
>     [RFC5988] MUST refer to a particular patent disclosure made with
>     respect to the material being referenced by context IRI.
>
> 3. 'disclosure-list' Link Relation Type
>
>     Whenever the 'disclosure' relation is defined, the target IRI MUST
>     designate a list of patent disclosures made with respect to the
>     material being referenced by context IRI.
>
> As the doc. is in Last Call now, in order not to initiate a new one,
> please comment on these changes before January 6, so that I could know
> which version I should submit for IESG evaluation.
> ...

I don't see a compelling reason to distinguish both.

Best regards, Julian