Re: What to improve? BCP-38/SAC-004 anyone?

Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> Thu, 31 December 2015 10:01 UTC

Return-Path: <leifj@mnt.se>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 830381A1A83 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 02:01:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SThpsZpWMzsA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 02:01:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-x229.google.com (mail-lb0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 999D21A1A82 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 02:01:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lb0-x229.google.com with SMTP id pv2so140314277lbb.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 02:01:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnt-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QYeU+tRE0Hq+IO6f/scO8X/B2zSklCo1vXAUSDKQLNA=; b=kP5/KxLN2/yz3+3XUIZZCQfDhrweEXJ9Hms/n6JWfAbdRYVHQuFWivHO60QdOM2tSd cVt4NsdCxlzsskXoih81b8xulG3ciGtQqc20SNxSjhTnZ686Y3Y8HWrRyBwknuaLXu5w BjA1n5FsrYDJBupOvHSL2Vh/0g0KTBybP8XAf3kS2r0t6TIduj8/e4esJKIT+IRBUQ1w JXOa6+6+HlZJESZXT2fW5UeTUPuw3J1pbaIEYA8/zyZSPKbmk1Ri/rb0jfnaSGx6S2aK JfEsjgHclCh4bKBoeG5nwS+RPVXFzFO42TeuR8e5LPvOC1+a2dDJ9ZaQtseIyjiYK0pn XUXg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=QYeU+tRE0Hq+IO6f/scO8X/B2zSklCo1vXAUSDKQLNA=; b=UWZ54Xt9MKlZsvGp9Y1ixdEldN0I/KMlwvQABqKZMp6G6D1wnY83kPdoPEkzb3uy3T 2RqMXp68R72DI784W6u8be1Rbz7KyRPwhkS1NXMpE1aqhqqo/EdwBYGcfy89kye6e9Nn Bhcw4WJo+0bmmfuIQfCJBKD8rFHBgSPCpTuQ2NBLMAo+pQFmTIyd3h7vtXF3LeK5gjKb mej7YONoUjiiDmkyl022q4A1PHpyBcqzfuDRMmnq55BuZLFDyBlqudFpS39Vs7NkYAys 3qHSN4rPJvfGXaHdjnw1IgNZqoFdF0RCBUKl+nakjvN2sgSYlE7DJ5K28kMOBcfWaC6I YKFw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl/TwBH+skpDYdAkSPSA/MxYXZ+iWw478XlUj/zjcjRkqJWBkb0MFGofkKMgoPi1Iu9oRl1x27p5twHgPIfUtaZ9FHxfQ==
X-Received: by 10.112.172.233 with SMTP id bf9mr24994480lbc.137.1451556061662; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 02:01:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.0.109] (tb62-102-145-131.cust.teknikbyran.com. [62.102.145.131]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id h187sm5529040lfg.18.2015.12.31.02.01.00 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 31 Dec 2015 02:01:00 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: What to improve? BCP-38/SAC-004 anyone?
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <7664F94E-F7A6-4556-B1E6-2DE536A7B7FC@frobbit.se>
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <5684FCDB.7010009@mnt.se>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 11:00:59 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7664F94E-F7A6-4556-B1E6-2DE536A7B7FC@frobbit.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/_O8s0lpMwJZ-HCuFbAynye-Hb7E>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 10:01:05 -0000

On 2015-12-31 06:16, Patrik Fältström wrote:
> Is this connected to the fact that not even people developing standards
> use very same standards?

The problem is that we don't have enough dogs on our tasting panels: we
need to get more ops folks directly & actively involved in the IETF.

Examining some of our success stories I suspect we'd find extensive
involvement from operations in every case.