IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: What to improve? BCP-38/SAC-004 anyone?

Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> Thu, 31 December 2015 17:13 UTC

Return-Path: <leifj@mnt.se>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E74321A87F1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 09:13:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id egvry_qVwTl3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 09:13:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf0-x233.google.com (mail-lf0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AFE81A87BD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 09:13:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf0-x233.google.com with SMTP id c192so65388936lfe.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 09:13:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnt-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=VJA1XiOdD7/bUkKKAL3KfW6mVHX4tCfY9E+VEOwyVNE=; b=zwssZHFEyHlf8wYtaQltP2P81wImFFf2HYjYInAO8x7AjNqhLT4yLl7Awgmpz72H23 44OnMgSRnM6KCpzJKHrdFIQ2dQa2kiktGgF4YSSKWCdTivAWw7KXNhwSjRnzusHgyCmv oweOl0MQZBXWQfwnuPegoBJIQ58EhS4lpBRKi0rsSPJBDGcQC6s+tFunJXBFMWyM101W 435JwXlX7N0jN9ZibZPgikfxHEOf5gd4yioMACb9W7UuQOLUjfJbvf3WkB5aWP2GZhb4 UUUkGxN/fORsLNeedY84n3HhUuYcV6OIHcqwIpzQg62mg+7MAa9PkBmKIkyyMungjpy2 W5nA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=VJA1XiOdD7/bUkKKAL3KfW6mVHX4tCfY9E+VEOwyVNE=; b=b2FMSD2KTbn2xpfZGvLFpStfTFucJNMRSNea/lRCy7hxvQ3qPv4TXErkyAvs2PqLM7 dQhz/UV2IbzeR29tBZHZG8ektf2S14lNSuE9KBzdNvRSgaOHfI6Cc8xUb1QmXlPcM/g/ K98Bs9WRxadgoLZ1NfQvX8g6RlnUuykNBqm54F3fJFWeFFiil3fEpPNZ72/XZhCfjDoe 4OfQ7m0ICWRE7RtG8qAVNF9XRiFSsGWqS57b79R09w4ktBug7+Jd3TCfJbaOfBPLd49z 5EPO6z6prjWrsn/3K1qWuefBYAKwb+GBBCfm54Y6WiE+pe6ZdW76X14fAEvyrsOpw+bt mrmg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlUKTDOJxR5VIfjnDaESW82NSwFjoH3CfJQQPKw6kV0G0Iy+5npU7Sn1kmhk5R9dkSt/bCmRPeAsseIxsqZgdLIBx49wA==
X-Received: by 10.25.89.193 with SMTP id n184mr25957978lfb.28.1451582036221; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 09:13:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [2.64.222.65] (2.64.222.65.mobile.tre.se. [2.64.222.65]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j204sm12505879lfd.16.2015.12.31.09.13.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 31 Dec 2015 09:13:55 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: What to improve? BCP-38/SAC-004 anyone?
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13C75)
In-Reply-To: <A074CA07-691E-41A7-B1D7-33F4ECBED5A9@puck.nether.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 18:13:52 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0A10E9CC-C5D3-4FD7-9589-B91374CADE34@mnt.se>
References: <7664F94E-F7A6-4556-B1E6-2DE536A7B7FC@frobbit.se> <5684FCDB.7010009@mnt.se> <A074CA07-691E-41A7-B1D7-33F4ECBED5A9@puck.nether.net>
To: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/eX_DNGfzdkvi-Sm0CDxn-xtSvtw>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:14:00 -0000


Skickat från min iPhone

> 31 dec. 2015 kl. 18:04 skrev Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>:
> 
> 
>> On Dec 31, 2015, at 5:00 AM, Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> wrote:
>> 
>> On 2015-12-31 06:16, Patrik Fältström wrote:
>>> Is this connected to the fact that not even people developing standards
>>> use very same standards?
>> 
>> The problem is that we don't have enough dogs on our tasting panels: we
>> need to get more ops folks directly & actively involved in the IETF.
>> 
>> Examining some of our success stories I suspect we'd find extensive
>> involvement from operations in every case.
> 
> Sadly that’s not the case here.
> 
> The reason we (as an operator) can’t use BCP-38 is the vendor hardware can’t do it at line-rate and the performance hit is too much to sustain.
> 
> Sorry to disappoint.  We even dropped it as a requirement in 2015 because it was clear the gap was getting wider not narrower.
> 
> Happy to discuss in person in BA or anywhere else we end up at the same time.
> 
> - Jared

I dunno if that is true or not but in either case you just proved my point.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email