Re: IAB volunteers

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 26 May 2016 15:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0064412D653 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 May 2016 08:44:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JWOf_mHnDPNb for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 May 2016 08:44:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22b.google.com (mail-oi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48BB812D56E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 May 2016 08:44:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id k23so130683238oih.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 May 2016 08:44:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xIVzCm9SKGAce8nREhWhYI4B64nrwm1xYvN0pwVtFWU=; b=zz25xOFsVqTZWHRcWnPMgmEW5QIjXu71b7+UEagEsFeR2pDzB1gVGz05/LqXW52gtd NuF+ZZ60HpxZV9YRDVJTKNQyvZjN+U0co4wmJwslE5sn8hPSGwLG+dy2U2PeeJovs867 8N6neqW467qSjfFGyW19ki2fEQhulafUaissGwgnfph0AJk6XhL6NiOfwn011VwKoy+W yU21NOU4Eb7T6SbHo/CPvWiSzcubHbh6Gi0dtEzaTnNYuMuFdCiT2iPdjVcpXHYpMrPn HE8prQ8Om5pavIVmJ9/W5yKytb8JE/B3Jr5JNnI32JehnKya/Lukr+UPBN29hhWd7aCN /WxA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xIVzCm9SKGAce8nREhWhYI4B64nrwm1xYvN0pwVtFWU=; b=eA9E14m4lsEhRWdgaGgIG5sjU5YhaOpQerOVzGu/2yPhF7ypCojAfiIP8LwdbQNy4W cdZwOk3gNpo0rcMmK+XjWMLuq28q5lChg1aOg6Dwt2z0q/iz0KFefiKZScII1hchHZyC uhU8rLQK6WCzg3g7jRE/6QsTn5PQK9C6kMbN/QZEo8SM1kpr+hpMR51nC+EROcr2kx6O todDNgkJ0RVfqfKnrlJ4YbFfxlTqa7JK/1gozpQDrLGFeCgj+Mnox3kBtj2pUD9TUxio VEtseVHiEteK7gv7x/+sAvIXAdctQo8/+uYZRJIABzS5wnxeEx3+bwE3GkV55oAIL7cS 7cHA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLRhGVj60PQOfrWNFUv8qfSv8FY4xDCoFyqdg8J8eCpU+r/dV5pmz+ZjsJIhq08g49tYWwu0TnD/wzSUg==
X-Received: by 10.202.83.146 with SMTP id h140mr6609896oib.171.1464277496680; Thu, 26 May 2016 08:44:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.195.137 with HTTP; Thu, 26 May 2016 08:44:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20160526015322.0f21cae0@elandnews.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20160526015322.0f21cae0@elandnews.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 08:44:37 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMDAhUkA2m7-Np+7_HWxMNPZRqDVgRo5iV47pXph6hRHdA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IAB volunteers
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d28020ae8720533c0acb2
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/d3HqOlm4xOTma_X3-OGEY17FL2w>
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 15:44:59 -0000

Howdy,

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 1:56 AM, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:

> Hi Ted,
> At 11:10 25-05-2016, Ted Hardie wrote:
>
>> A same sex male couple attending the IETF in Singapore will  break the
>> law to have a normal family life.  Suspending that life for a week may have
>> no great important or lasting impact to some; for others it may mean they
>> cannot attend except remotely.  That latter choice may have an impact on
>> what jobs they can do for the IETF and may have an impact on their
>> employers' view of their work.
>>
>
> I understand that giving a person a choice about whether to break the law
> or not is a problematic choice.
>
> There is a message at
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/current/msg14921.html
> from the IAB about a volunteer to serve on the ICANN
> Technical Liaison Group with the following requirement: "The ICANN TLG is
> expected to meet in person at or around the three ICANN meetings held each
> year".  Would the inability to attend, for example, an ICANN meeting for
> the reason I mentioned above be a disqualifying factor?
>
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy
>

If a volunteer could not attend in person, I believe the IAB would ask
ICANN to provide facilities for remote participation.  I've put this
question on the IAB agenda for the June 1st meeting, so that we can confirm
that or provide a more complete answer.

regards,

Ted Hardie