Re: Update on feedback on US-based meetings, and IETF 102

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Thu, 13 April 2017 15:21 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 550B11292F5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 08:21:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eU33Y7G5Hjcg for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 08:21:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22d.google.com (mail-oi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF05A128B44 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 08:21:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id b187so68931433oif.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 08:21:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=WUT8ZbfjYglkIYvM99pR2yNLypbMNX9rXOZvYy5Uu5A=; b=IFBU/niDMDD0ZR/V23m1glJwIZpBkXBoHnY1mOBOaqqH++Hf79G7WqrnCPIVov7Vdx dn2fn+ayZBLbMfOauFCOBRoG5dMz6StMc8DMbaV+8euIxFbhWvNV3g7WgE/0ZQwl4QuF qysyE3ekhXrf2WXLfJLrASxZsjddMncJjhzPiOt9vvfBvsSizWi0vgon+ERTj7GWHQS/ ArmkgkCjyyAYAgnZys00OmJC/htASw/JNgfrmaPFaeUyH0RQPN8nz3/akEP3H3CoLbDu SOVZf8fK+zVHH5478OeLbNJq2iQFPeSc7SVrtHBwEkX5jjteP+kVAVZE2/VjMdM0Ralr nR1g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WUT8ZbfjYglkIYvM99pR2yNLypbMNX9rXOZvYy5Uu5A=; b=ZXC6p8eJUmAj3XuIuvnOf8hc6nWf1XRKUXzZ/9m5DmngbnRaaKDsm2XB3hZax3maYZ SVf2q560xpJjM/k8YuJoDHY0HjTpzThK76EFeK2AwnbLP3/X+H/g4WvVJu2+Y0MIFvJF P2jwBSUY/HzUxTKv4H+wOuewk9Qufe6ZuDZF59HCQdlBJRBd7sbm5rcCHsSKUOFVd94Y lRe4+/XCUDh0r3d26nb62KQHWwGtIfIjnqNcP4FxbtmsltqZB8vURa6tenngvDhqrgxm TfVeNeRNCAQS8vxFB1NDE+cmaLey1WAANCYDzV58Zj9skOdN7Q2UxAfYVYkj+4CTV+zf FajA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7HxbWbpzEZEBDZMu+o+Kp4rWSRmVOZ7CeGw+tvlQtyFWzIOAk4 jTXsZD43mhLba9Zeac16wAMRaDyCSw==
X-Received: by 10.202.226.81 with SMTP id z78mr1557591oig.96.1492096893355; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 08:21:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: hallam@gmail.com
Received: by 10.157.22.175 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 08:21:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <06e001d2b44f$340c40c0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
References: <149204035801.15694.8437554373033456064.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <16010f27-e86b-b17d-4a13-62645e0bdc89@cs.tcd.ie> <m2lgr5yttn.wl-randy@psg.com> <b5846131-d912-b288-670b-2f74c901b2d5@gmail.com> <06e001d2b44f$340c40c0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 11:21:32 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: kck7td_Ya-Hm7ZfD7ltw1BzsCYU
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwhTHo3oD7x1Hr6nSw7ZYUR7cxHo9+1S6Zv2ddB9DJ5hjA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Update on feedback on US-based meetings, and IETF 102
To: "tom p." <daedulus@btconnect.com>
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1141b3124c8aca054d0de1ae"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/gr-ptU0gJHps9_TFkudjt5_LnC4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 15:21:36 -0000

The problem with the current state of unpredictability is that the trust
and good faith which previously underpinned the actions of the authorities
has been stripped away.

When you have a politician ranting to a mob that Muslims and Mexicans won't
be allowed in and they get elected, that has consequences. All the actions
that have in the past been dismissed as unrepresentative are being held up
as representative examples.

The idea of a security concern that only happens to affect specific
airlines flying specific routes is rather difficult for me to accept. When
it turns out that the only two governments to impose the restrictions just
so happen to have a commercial interest in establishing a non tariff
barrier to protect their own hub airports against competition, one does ask
if security is merely being used as a pretext for a measure designed to
protect trade interests, not people.

The system of international relationships and connections depends on trust.
I for one do not see any reason to give any politician the benefit of the
doubt when I am taking them at their word.

What is said, cannot be unsaid. There are very good reasons why politicians
with long experience in the system do not attempt to gain office using the
methods that characterized 2016. It is one thing to gain office, quite
another to gain power.