Re: Comments on draft-carpenter-newtrk-questions-00.txt

"Spencer Dawkins" <spencer@mcsr-labs.org> Thu, 13 July 2006 00:49 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G0pON-000069-Hq; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 20:49:23 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G0pOL-0008DQ-7j for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 20:49:21 -0400
Received: from stsc1260-eth-s1-s1p1-vip.va.neustar.com ([156.154.16.129] helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G0oJ4-0000OJ-LD for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 19:39:50 -0400
Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net ([63.240.77.83]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G0oDn-0000jl-Ii for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 19:34:25 -0400
Received: from s73602 (h1cd5-net84db.lab.risq.net?[132.219.28.213]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with SMTP id <20060712233416013009pf5le>; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 23:34:16 +0000
Message-ID: <009301c6a60b$922817f0$d51cdb84@china.huawei.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencer@mcsr-labs.org>
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <p06300025c0db326985f9@[142.131.134.210]>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 19:33:25 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="response"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869
X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-)
X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370
Subject: Re: Comments on draft-carpenter-newtrk-questions-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Hi, Randall,

> I'd also like to note that our specifications are not atomic; advancing 
> from PS to DS means showing at least two interworking implementations of 
> every feature and option.

Well said.

"moving to full standard for SIP requires moving to full standard for 
HTTP/1.1..."

This was actually the scariest thing I've heard in a SIP meeting, and that 
covers some ground.

Spencer 



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf