Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3

[Mary Barnes <[e-mail]>]

Hi Dan,

The term peer to peer is intended to exclude mechanisms that would use
a central repository for the information:  This was discussed in an
earlier thread:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch/current/msg02027.html

In one sense it is a solution, however, in another sense it is reusing
SIP related functionality defined in RAI and thus is in a similar vein
as specifying the use of SIP in a charter.

Thanks,
Mary.

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
<[e-mail]> wrote:
>> The VIPR WG will address this problem by developing a peer to
>> peer based approach to finding domains that claim to be
>> responsible for a given phone number and validation protocols
>> to ensure a reasonable likelihood that a given domain
>> actually is responsible for the phone number.
>
> Hi,
>
> Clarification question. What exactly means 'peer to peer based approach'
> and what kind of approaches are excluded by having this in the charter.
> Does 'approach' mean solution? If so why does a specific type of
> solution need to be agreed in the charter, while all we have at hand at
> this point are individual contribution I-Ds that describe the 'problem
> statement and some possible starting points for solutions'?
>
> Thanks and Regards,
>
> Dan
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [e-mail]
>> [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Mary Barnes
>> Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 8:38 PM
>> To: DISPATCH
>> Subject: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3
>>
>