IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Thu, 23 February 2017 06:05 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A5F51295DF for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 22:05:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tdl8Eh-X2eMN for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 22:05:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk0-x233.google.com (mail-vk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 535E312A0D5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 22:05:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vk0-x233.google.com with SMTP id r136so14591682vke.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 22:05:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=W7PqxlxdOgWwHQumYUsk3WCr9jVy3Caqtw3gIorgkEo=; b=kGgyNeS28XcUXjSXVYcMuNO3PDBQJJXn4DSivoMcnJCACobCCFTDOK5fGidiaV4W/4 MITBXyx6utJvNfpnff0X1FL4VxxWnLL0kNR5BhPNWv/o3eJPk0LR1wdYaSU83/PkNij7 ZmQNWOihQr167bUDQVela23DhTNZmP3dZRJhpvzApEfLGwkgu4IPvSFBCaGAFsOudpuX Q/M3oPjmVEeSePzDlFbGIH1M7AvK/6nJPBmpZRqQhecr3Vy60qQO0m0TILxwaBZeQd7i Z8m2wstFhPWxIxXhCK8nfI1BH7Bkhoypx0Nn4nBPf035ALrA5lKMv1qB6JKAmW17Yw/a D63g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=W7PqxlxdOgWwHQumYUsk3WCr9jVy3Caqtw3gIorgkEo=; b=ttiFz9Z4TFOSbHdKEKg1Z2HGDuF+drOuS3NA2iK/8KJ5AtuayIysAge2iwsrbRSti4 2XiJCtucih7ZjVuI9m4lrzdp+KXnwOm28Yd2jS7pWkEzRXRN8SKYK7jPfWdsK2C/y19b lOrQHy7rkVoNI9pQSwpLkjb//nktOT4rRt76vMeCkdY5IKmVTFUAWcMfxNswZ4vGRNKl 72lcOc414DozOJwRrEtxv8N0l/0qrDrwrm91j4Y0s6arbr7JCIjhkU408xZERqUZTuA3 BLEuRsxfas+e9M93WFbcy+TcQ08uCx39mLzIsO01q29OtRQ4R+x0SazuzZhdG8bdxMFg oQ9Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nfAkyix43MMYlVQWgIgcLii6u5p/+hIKNeY3Q3C7FWWB6bSJchkWVpwwINXPjFqLjh6FEEy4hN0phTRsqd
X-Received: by 10.31.59.197 with SMTP id i188mr13826143vka.45.1487829924052; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 22:05:24 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.171.2 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 22:05:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <m2vas1ttsj.wl-randy@psg.com>
References: <20170221001940.GB84656@Vurt.local> <068ce975-8b1e-a7c5-abba-2bfc1d904d70@gmail.com> <20170221101339.GC84656@Vurt.local> <CAKD1Yr33oQb=gMGaEM++hLgmMtxMdihiDrUihEsjs63vy8qRbA@mail.gmail.com> <54c81141-e4f5-4436-9479-9c02be6c09bb@Spark> <CAKD1Yr28iQHt0iuLvR3ndrT3Hfct=4k9dxjJeu3MAjDjOogEvA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9jLaZgTp++PJ9KGHEWuPoVm6t3b8QfVDCEhz5h4fv-0fuUAA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr3SbR=xt3RPu7+q1o14wKuUuwUc6oG+BgZtEK1O+m5sWw@mail.gmail.com> <4936e96b-fc82-4de0-9188-ced9547deb2f@Spark> <CAKD1Yr3K+SJb_4ksZ96yNypVKJE-fXopuVaXNhhKp1gkh1=QEg@mail.gmail.com> <20170222144147.GC89584@hanna.meerval.net> <7960ff2d-359f-429c-6e82-ef592f90bf53@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1W+AVt4Dixo9epB5VazxBsVMD+mrshwaE=n7SuX6eGDw@mail.gmail.com> <m2a89dveop.wl-randy@psg.com> <CAKD1Yr1igJiL_2BVi=RL_Wkd6V0O6WaPJ5fMS+ggVkTRAOdPXw@mail.gmail.com> <m2vas1ttsj.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 15:05:03 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3cZxsFqkLf=obAngCp5W-1EMnn4bsx-JcvaEaHOYTOCw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1142f1781c6dd905492c669e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/rZ4X-xHJHN3dPDN1qJkPIh_GezM>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, IETF-Discussion Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>, Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>, draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis@ietf.org, 6man-chairs@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 06:05:28 -0000

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:

> > the IETF and 6man absolutely have the ability to change the standard,
> > but it should follow the proper process: write a draft, get consensus,
>
> that is the process we are currently in.  but there seems to be serious
> disagreement over the draft.
>

AIUI the goal of the process is to reclassify the current specification.
That severely restricts the types of changes that are possible. That is the
basis on which this document gained WG consensus and reached IETF last call.

If we want to say that we're no longer reclassifying the current
specification but are instead opening the door to bigger changes, then the
document should go back to the WG for further work because the existing WG
consensus was based on the stated goal of reclassifying the document.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email