IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations-08.txt>(Initial Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) AuthenticationScheme Registrations) to Informational RFC

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Sat, 26 October 2013 11:31 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82FA811E8177 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 04:31:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p4hf+g+eXOVj for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 04:31:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C071521F9FDE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 04:31:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.5.235.154] ([79.109.233.10]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MgHHO-1VNTZw1Wek-00NfsY for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 13:31:35 +0200
Message-ID: <526BA812.90606@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 13:31:30 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "t.p." <daedulus@btconnect.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations-08.txt>(Initial Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) AuthenticationScheme Registrations) to Informational RFC
References: <20131021132502.29409.87117.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <012601ced160$93102ee0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <CABkgnnWzVB4mGmaZhaZkQX23FoD3GQbGmC7Phu1QSjfazayAqw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnWzVB4mGmaZhaZkQX23FoD3GQbGmC7Phu1QSjfazayAqw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:gZwlwLfBi43dhanX7qrCxq0B+zruEh6ZunQDVf/TmpimLACgJSJ JuKlF2A+/fNtRZrBw3M3C8O/g5qA929OUtk10XRr/HSAJrc2J/GG7jGYUsZyhfLng650hwq sk5QyOTt3nG7tP9XUDn7TDmVRkpK6e1ZTjJs+Ctuy4fDgstOVAMOsk83bqq4YIq01QpAnE8 5db5wEMqfljMHUNegb/Og==
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 11:31:45 -0000

On 2013-10-25 18:59, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 25 October 2013 01:54, t.p. <daedulus@btconnect.com> wrote:
>> I see that we have been granted a fortnight to review eight,
>> inter-related, httpbis I-Ds, comprising over 300 pages, ending in the
>> course of IETF88 and in the run-up to a meeting when everyone comes out
>> of aestivation and the mailing lists are inundated.
>
> It's not like this work hasn't been in progress for about a decade
> already.  Though I do recall discussing a 4 week LC period at the last
> meeting.  Barry?

My experience is that longer last call periods usually do not generate 
more review, but just later review.

That being said, the timing indeed isn't optimal. On the other hand, it 
would be *really* good if we actually could discuss LC issues while in 
Vancouver.

So print the drafts (from the the HTML versions at 
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/#wg-httpbis>), and have a look at them 
on your trip to Vancouver...

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email