IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: To "lose the argument in the WG"

Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org> Tue, 14 February 2017 23:56 UTC

Return-Path: <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B31B129989 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 15:56:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Quarantine-ID: <3ti2D8UuNI97>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "MIME-Version"
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3ti2D8UuNI97 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 15:56:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from turing.pensive.org (turing.pensive.org [99.111.97.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016D7129981 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 15:56:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [99.111.97.136] (99.111.97.161) by turing.pensive.org with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9); Tue, 14 Feb 2017 15:48:32 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p0624060ad4c94966bc39@[99.111.97.136]>
In-Reply-To: <9e0de86c-ceb3-8d05-8191-bdfd68521f00@gmail.com>
References: <66A86016-0382-4B2C-B9E8-30638237CB68@qti.qualcomm.com> <00e13499-7cea-a79a-7de1-dd9bad4bc530@dcrocker.net> <20170214060156.73B32639AEDF@rock.dv.isc.org> <0A3B2FF0-8F1C-430E-B4ED-DFA4CDB1FDB3@gmail.com> <0FB75520-E0BA-453C-8CF6-9F2D05B95FD6@fugue.com> <76d4aff3-760c-b258-a4e5-426ba69923f7@dcrocker.net> <9e0de86c-ceb3-8d05-8191-bdfd68521f00@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Eudora for Mac OS X
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 15:56:28 -0800
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, dcrocker@bbiw.net, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
From: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>
Subject: Re: To "lose the argument in the WG"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/vjT6b-RpHLtUEmoiTKB-GOPqcfQ>
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 23:56:32 -0000

At 12:18 PM +1300 2/15/17, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

>  2. As a Gen-ART reviewer I've often seen drafts at IETF LC that
>  really *need* a general, in-depth review.

As a document author, I appreciate the area reviews done by GEN, SEC, 
etc.  However, I think they would be just as useful and perhaps more 
timely if done during WGLC (assuming the WG does a WGLC).

-- 
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly selected tag: ---------------
    The highlight of the annual Computer Bowl occurred when Bill Gates,
who was a judge, posed the following question to the contestants:
    "What contest, held via Usenet, is dedicated to examples of weird,
obscure, bizarre, and really bad programming?"
    After a moment of silence, Jean-Louis Gassee (ex-honcho at Apple)
hit his buzzer and answered "Windows."
                                          --Recounted by Adam C. Engst

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email