IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: What "1net" is... (was: Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Global Multistakeholder Meeting on the Future of Internet Governance)

SM <sm@resistor.net> Wed, 20 November 2013 18:20 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1891A1AE4B2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 10:20:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.79
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.79 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ny-0hVPeksG3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 10:20:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7622E1AE49F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 10:20:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rAKIKHPC006375; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 10:20:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1384971623; bh=+zPEhAJHdPI5bK1NJ5XEyTmuVCEK9a/lDv/7jbrR+qs=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=BmLxGtMjYlyOZDq7bI2c4d6Ad+O9A9qKqTtzHpfhqeRebYEK+qt3OjDcuAuhA3Ew2 DEAwqgrrwWkuZFQ7eM8oGQCKEFwN0sJzR5oJa18IJzjM9Zj/MMxZMG8hdvbhLZAJT3 Dh1Yfai0Nf4heG/eVc78YoO1tNxk0Y0vTjvRikak=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1384971623; i=@resistor.net; bh=+zPEhAJHdPI5bK1NJ5XEyTmuVCEK9a/lDv/7jbrR+qs=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=G4sEELxZmSpcBL3CbldXPsUtv0GtFSxeAn5VoYaCBrpwx2mExlsWjhG7ErCRtitKv LYYuBC5mxPwWzW0PT7h2qIpKD/xazrZ6VK/41AJG3HjO5VbjyauWYpnJtp5I8NBfp3 AqtjpToVA4pWrlWYranb/yis2Ag2Rpf2jPXfJxAM=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20131120092459.0babcad8@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 09:48:27 -0800
To: John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: What "1net" is... (was: Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Global Multistakeholder Meeting on the Future of Internet Governance)
In-Reply-To: <B03FAD81-0628-4E16-AE68-7AA422F83227@istaff.org>
References: <CEB11C43.17FCB5%jonne.soininen@renesasmobile.com> <71815014-3FE5-4FCD-AA6A-9180D5B3ADA9@piuha.net> <m238msx8dn.wl%randy@psg.com> <F59BEBEF-641E-4793-A682-9302DA775E1F@gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20131119230902.0cedcb90@resistor.net> <CAMzo+1ZRqKcT8p4ppvW=iaTPfQ=CEWypqc_-aZ07SB1g0az_vg@mail.gmail.com> <B03FAD81-0628-4E16-AE68-7AA422F83227@istaff.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 18:20:36 -0000

Hi John,
At 05:53 20-11-2013, John Curran wrote:
>for the very new  "1net" initiative to assist in planning with this 
>meeting.   There are folks from civil society, academia, and 
>business sectors working to put folks a "1net" steering committee as 
>fast as possible, and there is a need for similar representation 
>from the Technical community.  If you want to help the 1net 
>initiative along and additional be involved in a planning a 
>conference on very challenging timelines, then consider both joining 
>the mailing list and also volunteering on the list for being on the 
>initial 1net steering committee.

The above mentions that "there is a need for similar representation" 
without providing enough details.  It might be easier if the 
person(s) who identified that need could explain what qualities are 
required to be considered as being from the "Technical community".

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email