Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-perpass-attack-02.txt> (Pervasive Monitoring is an Attack) to Best Current Practice

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Wed, 18 December 2013 02:54 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F831AE02F; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 18:54:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.438
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CXE9-hzjawqp; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 18:54:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 119E01ADF43; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 18:54:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41F1BE5B; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 02:54:35 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xe28AY8qhp7T; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 02:54:34 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.87.48.9] (unknown [86.42.29.6]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 881B8BE3E; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 02:54:34 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <52B10E6A.9000405@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 02:54:34 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-perpass-attack-02.txt> (Pervasive Monitoring is an Attack) to Best Current Practice
References: <20131203174852.21387.26099.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL0qLwbUX6uaoKUMGXvePRRcUGp-DG97WSBwQ0C_-MrHFRBn5Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwbUX6uaoKUMGXvePRRcUGp-DG97WSBwQ0C_-MrHFRBn5Q@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 02:54:40 -0000

Worked on it tonight, need to check various bits but it'll
be out Friday/Sat.

S

On 12/18/2013 02:27 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> Seriously late to the party here, sorry...
> 
> Is there any chance of having a look at an -03, or maybe a proposed diff to
> -02 given the discussion so far?  I don't want to comment on old resolved
> stuff.
> 
> -MSK
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 9:48 AM, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
>>
>> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
>> the following document:
>> - 'Pervasive Monitoring is an Attack'
>>   <draft-farrell-perpass-attack-02.txt> as Best Current Practice
>>
>> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
>> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
>> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2013-12-31. Exceptionally, comments may be
>> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
>> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>>
>> Abstract
>>
>>
>>    The IETF has consensus that pervasive monitoring is a technical
>>    attack that should be mitigated in the design of IETF protocols,
>>    where possible.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The file can be obtained via
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farrell-perpass-attack/
>>
>> IESG discussion can be tracked via
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farrell-perpass-attack/ballot/
>>
>>
>> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>>
>>
>>
>