Re: [IETF] DMARC methods in mailman

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 26 December 2016 14:12 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94EFD1294C3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Dec 2016 06:12:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y3uAFCtKgvpl for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Dec 2016 06:11:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x229.google.com (mail-qk0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A67612943C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Dec 2016 06:11:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x229.google.com with SMTP id n21so193100281qka.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Dec 2016 06:11:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=8Lf8w8wCbelRPX7QNCoSnSgXA/53RqfzDBN5gUAjYKY=; b=WiQ9iAtjCK1e2HYebOouuqCVMmGVjgnwyyjBbvEThE96SQ/oHGlT1nyLSZQcmZrVB0 GYxMRM8RzrXN5wYiOnePK7qYjHWjLwoUsPPrqdAqEiVs4UMNZCLkZhIpTuriNlLDXcGU 9HCIHEKx1MEHfG0Hut7e9Oa/ZVsS1aFFD6P6Iq/XsjaePgRbqpuLSol99ABi4H/HQ9j+ hrBSjMyrnJ57Ee7adfm/c+qmOt0RKC6ep3vbfuEL2PXCw/G1vo/kdoCZADDpJeMhdxcS xgQXO9JZFixQmfdhQiwaIYHy7UCdb/R8CW59spW7//NwOQ/foHtPWIx/PbcZKcoO5735 7VJA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=8Lf8w8wCbelRPX7QNCoSnSgXA/53RqfzDBN5gUAjYKY=; b=oFN1s3vQjkdtPnJwj4zExSiOR02gdtQftcm0UmEfTjPDgcKW9bd/phXPZx4PZh9qdv BsrHeobQlbUiA+Ryk4wNeN4nRA10vJsUzEj8dAKJoT8BLJM1xkzjy+M9W8kqBLQIqq4u UO5sZw54/QYlgUNGaOltB4resXk8aZO1naMSBbP+eVrj13RnqJSc1C2OgPKnJR5go1O5 ZDmAsrqaBL5TKLAtaK+5QfWWUZClXIS0UkyoFDp316lJAznsw7MdXIpT1x6XiwiuwenQ KtawL4QqHovcgeS37vRsi2Zu3B0AM+yvTNnhNv7Ur9oghwmxwGw6GgxVDByxKaiinbUj E/4g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKOeUa3/862o1MR5IvaO0kEQfszj2bWXhWXYex7qCOu936cfDxaELrTsyOO9sKmtA==
X-Received: by 10.55.148.199 with SMTP id w190mr11971699qkd.9.1482761514033; Mon, 26 Dec 2016 06:11:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.6.32] ([107.19.189.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a47sm26308709qtc.17.2016.12.26.06.11.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 26 Dec 2016 06:11:52 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <44C6FCE9-8EDA-4572-BE6C-95BA9156EE61@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_03D3C6CF-D843-459C-B956-529550B3B5BC"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Subject: Re: [IETF] DMARC methods in mailman
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2016 09:11:50 -0500
In-Reply-To: <m1cLUTY-0000HWC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
To: Philip Homburg <pch-ipv6-ietf-3@u-1.phicoh.com>
References: <m1cLUTY-0000HWC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/yu5UrsXIyWPZbqFjZNXM_fEWoLE>
Cc: IETF general list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2016 14:12:00 -0000

On Dec 26, 2016, at 7:33 AM, Philip Homburg <pch-ipv6-ietf-3@u-1.phicoh.com> wrote:
> If we are to assume that suscribers to technical mailing lists like the IETF
> are stupid enough

Perhaps instead of casting aspersions on our fellows, we should _stop_ making assumptions about why they use email addresses provided by operators that behave in ways we don’t like.