Re: [Ietf108planning] [irsg] Preview of survey on virtual meetings

Stephen

> On 24/04/2020, at 8:05 AM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
> 
> 
> - Question numbers would've helped in this review.

Yes sorry, they get in the way when live but not for review.

> - Why do we need such fine-grained location? (Svalbard:-)

That has reverted to region.

> 
> - Which applies to you is always a bit irritating as it can
> personally identify people (esp Colin I guess - that looks
> a bit silly) We could coalesce a bunch of those with no
> loss.

It does need shortening -  a number of others have made similar comments.

> 
> - A bunch of questions are quite complex relative to other
> surveys. I don't know how that may affect results.
> 
> - "Did the scheduling of the virtual interims since the one
> week virtual IETF 107 meeting (20-27 March 2020) allow you
> to participate in all of those you wanted to?" seems like
> an odd question - I'd expect 90% "no." Maybe better to ask
> "on a scale of 1-5" or something.
> 
> - "how productive has your IETF meeting experience" could
> confuse, because I wasn't "at" an IETF meeting. Maybe ask
> instead "how productive has your IETF107 meeting-
> replacement experience" instead?

Done.

> 
> - "virtual IETF meeting" - there were comments on the list
> about that to the effect that "online IETF meeting" is
> better. I'd say it may well be.

I agree.

> 
> - All the "worst possible TZ" questions are a bit odd
> because of that. Might be better to assume Madrid's TZ
> for those questions, I think we'd get better info even
> if we don't use the Madrid TZ in the end.

Several people have said that.  We originally chose that and decided against it as we don’t want to pre-judge the timing of the meeting.  We will reconsider.

> 
> Cheers,
> S.
> 
> PS: Longer term, it'd be nice if we had a less privacy
> invasive service to use than survey monkey. In this case
> I can't see comments from others without creating an
> account (which I don't wanna do), and there's really no
> need for user-tracking for our surveys.

The surveys are run with all user tracking turned off but I take your point about comments - others have made the same point.

Jay

> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 23/04/2020 01:26, Jay Daley wrote:
>> The small group set up by the IESG, LLC and IRTF Chair [1] to plan
>> for IETF 108 has developed a survey to be sent out as widely as
>> possible to IETF/IRTF participants to get views on the Future of
>> Virtual Meetings.  You are now welcome to preview the survey [2] and
>> provide feedback.  You can create a surveymonkey account and comment
>> directly on the preview or send comments to ietf108planning@ietf.org
>> 
>> We are hoping to send this survey out on Tuesday 28 April US time so
>> please have any comments in well before that.  The survey is expected
>> to run for ~9 days, less than is ideal but necessary given the
>> possible work ahead.
>> 
>> If you have any suggestions on distribution then those are also most
>> welcome.
>> 
>> thanks Jay
>> 
>> [1]  Alissa Cooper, Colin Perkins, Martin Duke, Alvaro Retana, Alexa
>> Morris, Greg Wood, Jay Daley [2]
>> https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=wlD1DqfXW8oxNST4ldDKk4dUN9OVHPs_2BCNWKZzQXuRAPHQA8Dy3EFy08_2B14_2BJekO#
>> 
>> 
>> 
> <0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc>-- 
> Ietf108planning mailing list
> Ietf108planning@ietf.org <mailto:Ietf108planning@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf108planning <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf108planning>
-- 
Jay Daley
IETF Executive Director
jay@ietf.org