Re: [Ietf108planning] [irsg] Preview of survey on virtual meetings

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

- Question numbers would've helped in this review.

- Why do we need such fine-grained location? (Svalbard:-)

- Which applies to you is always a bit irritating as it can
personally identify people (esp Colin I guess - that looks
a bit silly) We could coalesce a bunch of those with no
loss.

- A bunch of questions are quite complex relative to other
surveys. I don't know how that may affect results.

- "Did the scheduling of the virtual interims since the one
week virtual IETF 107 meeting (20-27 March 2020) allow you
to participate in all of those you wanted to?" seems like
an odd question - I'd expect 90% "no." Maybe better to ask
"on a scale of 1-5" or something.

- "how productive has your IETF meeting experience" could
confuse, because I wasn't "at" an IETF meeting. Maybe ask
instead "how productive has your IETF107 meeting-
replacement experience" instead?

- "virtual IETF meeting" - there were comments on the list
about that to the effect that "online IETF meeting" is
better. I'd say it may well be.

- All the "worst possible TZ" questions are a bit odd
because of that. Might be better to assume Madrid's TZ
for those questions, I think we'd get better info even
if we don't use the Madrid TZ in the end.

Cheers,
S.

PS: Longer term, it'd be nice if we had a less privacy
invasive service to use than survey monkey. In this case
I can't see comments from others without creating an
account (which I don't wanna do), and there's really no
need for user-tracking for our surveys.







On 23/04/2020 01:26, Jay Daley wrote:
> The small group set up by the IESG, LLC and IRTF Chair [1] to plan
> for IETF 108 has developed a survey to be sent out as widely as
> possible to IETF/IRTF participants to get views on the Future of
> Virtual Meetings.  You are now welcome to preview the survey [2] and
> provide feedback.  You can create a surveymonkey account and comment
> directly on the preview or send comments to [e-mail]
> 
> We are hoping to send this survey out on Tuesday 28 April US time so
> please have any comments in well before that.  The survey is expected
> to run for ~9 days, less than is ideal but necessary given the
> possible work ahead.
> 
> If you have any suggestions on distribution then those are also most
> welcome.
> 
> thanks Jay
> 
> [1]  Alissa Cooper, Colin Perkins, Martin Duke, Alvaro Retana, Alexa
> Morris, Greg Wood, Jay Daley [2]
> https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=wlD1DqfXW8oxNST4ldDKk4dUN9OVHPs_2BCNWKZzQXuRAPHQA8Dy3EFy08_2B14_2BJekO#
>
> 
>