Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Tomorrow's meeting

Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com> Tue, 28 May 2019 23:38 UTC

Return-Path: <femi@arista.com>
X-Original-To: igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 210A9120047 for <igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 May 2019 16:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=arista.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 91qn5c7DvryU for <igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 May 2019 16:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52f.google.com (mail-pg1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA0DC120090 for <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 May 2019 16:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id w34so138017pga.12 for <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 May 2019 16:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arista.com; s=googlenew; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=HFtjE3x+7vflpO+Zc4oTAKl/6DEGP1zmc2A3+hD9ekY=; b=E3gV+v0C+KNfWGeX43hK54MFjtReWZ9x3jpPwb5PZKmIDJfiEeEq2kE1xIA/lr2lfV BKcadCVs0OP/7h8MTY5A+T7GBdVGVi+oM9MQwPUpdOuLYaGNI0kC5rj3bOl2vAiXpj5j snBgT3VuHuX1HG1z41g2IDauER00UZUr/EHv//Gtvnrw2LicXRJ0aJZEOUmK7NeWDnW/ JADKx7GmRDFeAnXK2MLYLx8/v0+SW62k2bmo7iWMyLr28PRtY4pcE9T3xPVQd8kbH9Mw dw0hR1WKPFMT2kSbjoQiuuAmIQjEKPIN2ljpNcE+PwBB3/v0rss4JWw9wWCMya9u9+g0 S0Xg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=HFtjE3x+7vflpO+Zc4oTAKl/6DEGP1zmc2A3+hD9ekY=; b=LNqXEGjNEhA/2MVBXxGhavAEpVEa5myzKwdQIp57cGa3dC91hmIqUN0yNRAZO2HKdk FWzxvsX7D4rGaolsmzrk0YDGv2E0gVaYKGMFARnuatHz80rZ7DMI3TFIpjeGz7tnkJkC DFZGYUwl2quFXm1LH7g/dwoIADiz6PXt0CFtH+44ADzHqXiNZrvSnqQTOCEqH5Y/ol0E wb0etYuebTE9WZixtPnbBg78diA6flxw2/wu9E/nTOX9mrPNUMHpinSm+m2RYd/w2y8f tomUgKssLleac0KWUIxqmxnLxXPdC5hdq+fm0vXB9saiRT+h5beklWz3wCZVi6DHxiyi 3pRQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXPRZcU+rB/dONftt0GQX4ER1gnGrhvBbJ7UrPWF/Z1yxYBMyJ3 adZ3ui6Sde8w1pDl74sVLg5EzQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzG7YQ2Y50pCj+1veLgciXV+G8WyRDNfTU2nKsumHIt06Z6vf3BXzSBvJZhTaQdD/ok+64NoQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:d41c:: with SMTP id a28mr47755216pfh.31.1559086719321; Tue, 28 May 2019 16:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.81] (host81-159-144-83.range81-159.btcentralplus.com. [81.159.144.83]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t11sm13629033pgp.1.2019.05.28.16.38.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 28 May 2019 16:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com>
In-Reply-To: <5C363D02-6913-4672-82F6-309E10C3E03C@arista.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 00:38:35 +0100
Cc: Anish Peter <anish.ietf@gmail.com>, "Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)" <mankamis@cisco.com>, "igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org" <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5B00E7A8-F32E-48AC-8CBA-6E0441CD7001@arista.com>
References: <94764FD1-AA9D-475F-A888-ADCF941C0565@arista.com> <9516CE1F-999A-4841-9D77-ABD64C642BE3@cisco.com> <CAA6qS9qGB+zm30nm-Or=8oMSQBpLqV=XeJ68Z3h84T-LWX2fxA@mail.gmail.com> <20190501141529.akjsqlqh64x3qnmf@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <5C363D02-6913-4672-82F6-309E10C3E03C@arista.com>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/igmp-mld-bis/FZOp36lqF09f6vWd1RDNA0Ed22w>
Subject: Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Tomorrow's meeting
X-BeenThere: igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <igmp-mld-bis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/igmp-mld-bis>, <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/igmp-mld-bis/>
List-Post: <mailto:igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis>, <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 23:38:42 -0000

I think we should try to progress this work over the coming weeks.  Hopefully we can meet tomorrow and discuss next steps.

I re-read the latest version of the questionnaire and was wondering if we should spell out what features in the RFCs we are interested in?  For example, in Section 3.1.2, we ask “Which IGMPv3 features have you implemented?” I can imagine some folks giving answers referring to what they consider IGMPv3 features (e.g. snooping proxy etc) that are not actually in the RFCs we are focusing on.  Furthermore, in the PIM survey (RFC7063) the authors actually itemise the features in RFC4601 in which they are interested.  So, to help us be able to better process the responses, I wonder if we should itemise the features that we are trying to gauge their popularity?

Which made me wonder,  other than Include list and exclude list, are there other features we should call out?

Regards,
Femi

> On 1 May 2019, at 15:18, Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com> wrote:
> 
> Mankamana, Timothy and myself were on the call.  Mankamana is going to email the chairs to try to determine the next steps to distributing the questionnaire.
> 
> Regards,
> Femi
> 
> 
>> On 1 May 2019, at 15:15, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
>> 
>> Ok, thats the classical excuse until we get rid of DST i guess ;-)
>> I was only 15 minutes late, so i have no real excuse.... ;-)
>> 
>> On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 07:35:08PM +0530, Anish Peter wrote:
>>> Very sorry, I happened to join this meeting 1hr late.
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 6:48 PM Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) <
>>> mankamis@cisco.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Sure .
>>>> 
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>> 
>>>>> On Apr 30, 2019, at 03:01, Olufemi Komolafe <femi=
>>>> 40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I feel we are losing some momentum with this effort and so I think
>>>> tomorrow when we meet it???d be really good to identify exactly what remains
>>>> to be done and set some milestones and deadlines.  Does that seem
>>>> reasonable?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Femi
>>>>> --
>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
>>>> --
>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
>>>> 
>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> ---
>> tte@cs.fau.de
>