Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Tomorrow's meeting

[Anish Peter <[e-mail]>]

I am on my commute right now. I will be late.


On Monday, June 17, 2019, Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Sorry guys, I was in cisco live whole week.
>
> Thanks
> Mankamana
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olufemi Komolafe <[e-mail]>
> Date: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 at 6:13 AM
> To: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
> Cc: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <
> [e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>,
> "Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)" <[e-mail]>
> Subject: Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Tomorrow's meeting
>
>     It seems no one else is joining the call.  Perhaps we can discuss the
> best next steps on this list then….
>
>     Can you please reply to the last couple of emails from myself and Nic
> so we can make some progress?
>
>     Regards,
>     Femi
>
>     > On 3 Jun 2019, at 13:45, [e-mail] wrote:
>     >
>     > Hi,
>     >
>     > In Section 3.2.1 (Deployment Status) I guess under "4." It should
> read "deployed?" instead of "Implemented:".
>     >
>     > I think giving some more details on the features makes sense. I
> personally also see IGMP snooping/proxying as a feature
>     > (on our home gateways) even if those are not part of the protocol
> itself.
>     >
>     > regards
>     >
>     > Nic
>     >
>     > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>     > Von: Igmp-mld-bis <[e-mail]> Im Auftrag von
> Olufemi Komolafe
>     > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. Mai 2019 01:39
>     > An: Toerless Eckert <[e-mail]>
>     > Cc: Anish Peter <[e-mail]>; [e-mail];
> Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) <[e-mail]>
>     > Betreff: Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Tomorrow's meeting
>     >
>     > I think we should try to progress this work over the coming weeks.
> Hopefully we can meet tomorrow and discuss next steps.
>     >
>     > I re-read the latest version of the questionnaire and was wondering
> if we should spell out what features in the RFCs we are interested in?  For
> example, in Section 3.1.2, we ask “Which IGMPv3 features have you
> implemented?” I can imagine some folks giving answers referring to what
> they consider IGMPv3 features (e.g. snooping proxy etc) that are not
> actually in the RFCs we are focusing on.  Furthermore, in the PIM survey
> (RFC7063) the authors actually itemise the features in RFC4601 in which
> they are interested.  So, to help us be able to better process the
> responses, I wonder if we should itemise the features that we are trying to
> gauge their popularity?
>     >
>     > Which made me wonder,  other than Include list and exclude list, are
> there other features we should call out?
>     >
>     > Regards,
>     > Femi
>     >
>     >> On 1 May 2019, at 15:18, Olufemi Komolafe <[e-mail]> wrote:
>     >>
>     >> Mankamana, Timothy and myself were on the call.  Mankamana is going
> to email the chairs to try to determine the next steps to distributing the
> questionnaire.
>     >>
>     >> Regards,
>     >> Femi
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>> On 1 May 2019, at 15:15, Toerless Eckert <[e-mail]> wrote:
>     >>>
>     >>> Ok, thats the classical excuse until we get rid of DST i guess ;-)
> I
>     >>> was only 15 minutes late, so i have no real excuse.... ;-)
>     >>>
>     >>> On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 07:35:08PM +0530, Anish Peter wrote:
>     >>>> Very sorry, I happened to join this meeting 1hr late.
>     >>>>
>     >>>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 6:48 PM Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) <
>     >>>> [e-mail]> wrote:
>     >>>>
>     >>>>> Sure .
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>>> On Apr 30, 2019, at 03:01, Olufemi Komolafe <femi=
>     >>>>> [e-mail]> wrote:
>     >>>>>>
>     >>>>>> I feel we are losing some momentum with this effort and so I
> think
>     >>>>> tomorrow when we meet it???d be really good to identify exactly
>     >>>>> what remains to be done and set some milestones and deadlines.
>     >>>>> Does that seem reasonable?
>     >>>>>>
>     >>>>>> Regards,
>     >>>>>> Femi
>     >>>>>> --
>     >>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>     >>>>>> [e-mail]
>     >>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
>     >>>>> --
>     >>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>     >>>>> [e-mail]
>     >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
>     >>>>>
>     >>>
>     >>>> --
>     >>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>     >>>> [e-mail]
>     >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
>     >>>
>     >>>
>     >>> --
>     >>> ---
>     >>> [e-mail]
>     >>
>     >
>     > --
>     > Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>     > [e-mail]
>     > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
>
>
>
>