IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] New draft posted

Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com> Tue, 29 October 2019 23:23 UTC

Return-Path: <femi@arista.com>
X-Original-To: igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B636120940 for <igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.887
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.887 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MPART_ALT_DIFF_COUNT=1.112, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=arista.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4WeN_NqLXh95 for <igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:23:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x629.google.com (mail-pl1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::629]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35A2512025D for <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:23:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x629.google.com with SMTP id w8so59836plq.5 for <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:23:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arista.com; s=googlenew; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=HCr7LHmyfQXjYetRNYNJsLt0W7DvLNqFrlwlYqG/NK4=; b=MncDcAHrxPJ/SeswX+pP1aynWKy/rLRPIRIvrkrNql1K/KcmQLS8Sd1u3wrTez0LWT YhGltkBc9CGhIu+fhggTkx4dcVwarpBJSUrkSVlS7aKlHm3eC0zbCX2CQlHHP5tkM7Cm /DIPTBLQlsy6GH5AevisKyGNlkzYaW42ekoqP2jXPHFA6QffaGmYPTLZDyAtxVnjh2q2 GN7wgXoL0YwFDm3cqGoRXNzpEv0Yty2JQaEWT95klQgtmzMs3P6pMT1tSp2IyvIUmSxP LXo0XO2CDhDgVDAO4QrbI8DjvwCuFy5jWLZAFNU94NdC/ZXFoOfms0RNKsBHCZAXw4U1 DS0w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=HCr7LHmyfQXjYetRNYNJsLt0W7DvLNqFrlwlYqG/NK4=; b=QeSz7fng5Sj1zvefRzgZD6Y2CMJ+eqBpYy18X5jbhLNbIYSsegYVHzxhnznUVGiJCM mIpfNvnWa2YBGWj5X/D2DwQqI6LfjQWufBI0Rqcz1Qew2QfBIX9ao6lbfY3BNZ9HCEwb AoDDJnnyJFe6H++pFzJIEMOs9CYvD/DAIleidshbJOxP6FDk/bCGeKaYvCbs5hWD0myx i15dnIBtNQHQ2/Y+bW3TXm/GlKXQceJ3HhhsakovNLEl2EkMPM6kHCSninUCl4XFbLmk j7RXsHc+ngwYVjW39YDGmpYxFtguHAPHDNVzmffCZxnk/OVCfbmJ3G8RiK4w4KG3hDv1 rKbg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWIoqBIr/xZZNWJewAFZhB805u+/mn0TAu+buHDl3mTOZUabsxl w7SGR9HIOljeHkeQk80VvcEORlYubbES+w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxGTugdsOZXNZd9ixzVqppZ7ku5QhwmC6FAeU7pxlnyiVWKatICG0zgvuFO0MwlPy2lVgPmYg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b20b:: with SMTP id t11mr1265708plr.89.1572391407321; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:23:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.81] (host109-146-150-34.range109-146.btcentralplus.com. [109.146.150.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g9sm164915pjl.20.2019.10.29.16.23.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:23:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com>
Message-Id: <C1BD52A0-7F4F-41CE-BA66-A850D1737FCF@arista.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5BBE50FA-7807-4B5B-8BE7-DA36CBE882DF"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 23:23:23 +0000
In-Reply-To: <6C716B06-1A87-4BA0-A535-6D0073D95E22@arista.com>
Cc: Mike McBride <mmcbride7@gmail.com>, Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>, Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>
To: igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
References: <6C716B06-1A87-4BA0-A535-6D0073D95E22@arista.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/igmp-mld-bis/sA4dP9Qwjj-8vNVkn5Peutmeiiw>
Subject: Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] New draft posted
X-BeenThere: igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <igmp-mld-bis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/igmp-mld-bis>, <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/igmp-mld-bis/>
List-Post: <mailto:igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis>, <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 23:23:32 -0000

The naming of the drafts has been a bit messy.  We’ve had:
draft-volunteers-pim-igmp-mld-bis-00.txt
draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-bis-00 
draft-eckert-pim-igmp-mld-questionnaire-00 

Rather than creating a new document the WG chairs suggested creating draft-eckert-pim-igmp-mld-questionnaire-01 which I have just posted.  The -00 does not have the email address of some of the co-authors including myself.  Therefore, can someone whose email address was on the previous revision and so got a notification please approve the publication?

Regards,
Femi


 
> On 28 Oct 2019, at 01:15, Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com> wrote:
> 
> HI,
> 
> I’ve posted the updated version of the draft.  I could not update the original draft which has since expired as my email address was omitted on the original draft (https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/status/102921/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/status/102921/>) and so I’ve simply posted a new draft which I’ve attached FYI.
> 
> Regards,
> Femi
> 
> <draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-update-survey-00.txt>
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email