IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] IPv4 address sharing abuse [was RE: draft-boucadair-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis]

SM <sm@resistor.net> Thu, 08 September 2011 18:46 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57EE721F85EC for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 11:46:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.575
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.575 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nxGVPwb1dv-e for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 11:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49C5121F858D for <int-area@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 11:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.4/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p88Im4DC001528; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 11:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1315507691; bh=0mJlrRjsvuDhhPA9AhafJyLTpZ10LR98uVK7T5/bN7g=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=2sbmWSG31OWAMZeVBEUwUqxh6yPp+WLO20D4wgBQJMyHcynpSieoP3TFqnuypKlLv Jg5apViHn6ZZFF3XEYd8VZaA0Qq4Vd76vvW2IsWdEBT22WbAHBJ0csoJXhVLxG71MP Q931oPxnxpBVgbQPKNJZ7NolaYQervzsfieY6QlQ=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1315507691; bh=0mJlrRjsvuDhhPA9AhafJyLTpZ10LR98uVK7T5/bN7g=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=nXM0MSHDp93n4CsMAWnFABJZ+N2wAX1F/MJbFbn06KWDQDQKfWKlYaMoIgu8uWX+q ng3TRg9VUmhdOFwIAXrQzD1FN6PSrEHomaZvvq8AEYS5Gmuzm7sdfmMYVbHHmJ3kLI UD5wFr98CI2bSqZVwkbScxaVxU4oqXwwlloEsBdI=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20110908113731.0a218a98@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 11:48:05 -0700
To: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <201109081729.p88HTVnc092622@givry.fdupont.fr>
References: <Your message of Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:37:19 PDT. <06f201cc6ced$f0d14fc0$d273ef40$@com> <201109081729.p88HTVnc092622@givry.fdupont.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: int-area@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Int-area] IPv4 address sharing abuse [was RE: draft-boucadair-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis]
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/int-area>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 18:46:32 -0000

Hi Francis,
At 10:29 08-09-2011, Francis Dupont wrote:
>Perhaps I repeat myself but as far as I know solutions to the
>draft-boucadair-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis problem are illegal
>at some places, in particular in European Union (and at a level
>which overrules national texts)...
>IMHO this issue should be clarified before adopting any document
>as a WG item.

Are you saying that what draft-boucadair-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis 
argues for cannot be implemented in the European Union?

As a general comment, Section 1.2 of the draft discusses about 
privacy.  I have read
draft-morris-privacy-considerations-03.  I could not find which point 
in that draft, the following is based:

   "The HOST_ID does not reveal more privacy information than what the
    source IP address does in a non-shared address environment"

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email