Re: [Int-area] (REVISED) Call for adoption of draft-bonica-intarea-gre-mtu-06

Hi Fred;
	Thanks for the update in tunneling technologies, looks like I have some research to do. Other than fragmentation which was the focus of draft-bonica-intarea-gre-mtu what other problems are associated with Internet tunneling.

Jeff Hammond
Samsung System Engineer

-----Original Message-----
From: Templin, Fred L [mailto:Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 4:34 PM
To: Jeffery Hammond; 'Internet Area'
Subject: RE: [Int-area] (REVISED) Call for adoption of draft-bonica-intarea-gre-mtu-06

Hi Jeff,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Int-area [mailto:int-area-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jeffery 
> Hammond
> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 1:08 PM
> To: 'Internet Area'
> Subject: Re: [Int-area] (REVISED) Call for adoption of 
> draft-bonica-intarea-gre-mtu-06
> 
> 	I would like to see this also. Just went back and pulled the draft 
> dated 3/5/2010 (I hope this is the latest one draft-touch- 
> intarea-tunnels-01). It would be a good starting point. As this will only continue to grow and a central base and description would be nice.

Agreed.

> 	Other than I.P. in I.P. (GTP) and IPSec what other tunneling technologies would be considered?

There are lots and lots of them; way more than just GRE. Some kinds that operate over UDP/IP are in some ways more flexible than just IP-in-IP since  the network is so ossified around TCP and UDP. But, we should be able to come up with a set of BCP recommendations that apply to all tunnel types.

Thanks - Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com 

> Jeff Hammond
> Samsung System Engineer
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Int-area [mailto:int-area-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of 
> Templin, Fred L
> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 2:16 PM
> To: Suresh Krishnan; Internet Area
> Subject: Re: [Int-area] (REVISED) Call for adoption of 
> draft-bonica-intarea-gre-mtu-06
> 
> I will say again what I said at the microphone in Toronto. We really ought to move forward with "Tunnels in the Internet Architecture"
> first so that other documents that discuss specific tunnel types can use it as a point of departure (if necessary).
> 
> So, let's have Tunnels in the Internet Architecture brought back onto 
> the front burner first so that other documents that come later can use it as a normative reference.
> 
> Thanks - Fred
> fred.l.templin@boeing.com
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Int-area [mailto:int-area-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of 
> > Suresh Krishnan
> > Sent: Monday, September 08, 2014 9:17 PM
> > To: Internet Area
> > Subject: [Int-area] (REVISED) Call for adoption of
> > draft-bonica-intarea-gre-mtu-06
> >
> > Hi all,
> >     This draft has been presented at intarea face to face meetings 
> > and has received a bit of discussion. This call is being initiated 
> > to determine whether there is WG consensus towards adoption of
> > draft-bonica-intarea-gre-mtu-06 as an intarea WG draft. The draft is 
> > available at
> >
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-intarea-gre-mtu-06
> >
> > Please state whether or not you're in favor of the adoption by 
> > replying to this email. If you are not in favor, please also state 
> > your objections in your response. This adoption call will complete on 2014-09-23.
> >
> > Regards
> > Suresh & Juan Carlos
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Int-area mailing list
> > Int-area@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area