IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] (REVISED) Call for adoption of draft-bonica-intarea-gre-mtu-06

Jeffery Hammond <jhammond@sta.samsung.com> Tue, 30 September 2014 20:08 UTC

Return-Path: <jhammond@sta.samsung.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 929681A88EF for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 13:08:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.987
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.987 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XrA8jBlmE6hd for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 13:08:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cuda3.sta.samsung.com (mailedge.sta.samsung.com [63.166.115.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAF2F1A88AA for <int-area@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 13:08:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1412107680-04932107dd291a70001-lk1YkQ
Received: from exHub1.telecom.sna.samsung.com ([105.52.12.248]) by cuda3.sta.samsung.com with ESMTP id HNgmd8w1r4XbPUH3 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:08:00 -0500 (CDT)
X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: jhammond@sta.samsung.com
X-Barracuda-RBL-Trusted-Forwarder: 105.52.12.248
X-ASG-Whitelist: Client
Received: from EXMB1.telecom.sna.samsung.com ([fe80::d0be:6974:c894:369b]) by exHub1.telecom.sna.samsung.com ([fe80::804e:878f:5b5a:db50%16]) with mapi id 14.03.0146.000; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:08:00 -0500
From: Jeffery Hammond <jhammond@sta.samsung.com>
X-Barracuda-BWL-IP: fe80::d0be:6974:c894:369b
To: 'Internet Area' <int-area@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Int-area] (REVISED) Call for adoption of draft-bonica-intarea-gre-mtu-06
X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: [Int-area] (REVISED) Call for adoption of draft-bonica-intarea-gre-mtu-06
Thread-Index: AQHPzSucClWYHZLa5UGVCs0TKIqv65waN8og
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:07:59 +0000
Message-ID: <A5E70E0E5842004097CF17DFE3FA6C7F5D1E15BA@exMB1.telecom.sna.samsung.com>
References: <E87B771635882B4BA20096B589152EF62882B7A0@eusaamb107.ericsson.se> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832D15A4E@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com>
In-Reply-To: <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832D15A4E@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [105.52.12.198]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Barracuda-Connect: UNKNOWN[105.52.12.248]
X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1412107680
X-Barracuda-URL: http://65.169.250.17:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi
X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at sta.samsung.com
X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/T8l1Hm8FDawGrwIaVj7BCEufte4
Subject: Re: [Int-area] (REVISED) Call for adoption of draft-bonica-intarea-gre-mtu-06
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:08:50 -0000

	I would like to see this also. Just went back and pulled the draft dated 3/5/2010 (I hope this is the latest one draft-touch-intarea-tunnels-01). It would be a good starting point. As this will only continue to grow and a central base and description would be nice.
	Other than I.P. in I.P. (GTP) and IPSec what other tunneling technologies would be considered?

Jeff Hammond
Samsung System Engineer


-----Original Message-----
From: Int-area [mailto:int-area-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Templin, Fred L
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 2:16 PM
To: Suresh Krishnan; Internet Area
Subject: Re: [Int-area] (REVISED) Call for adoption of draft-bonica-intarea-gre-mtu-06

I will say again what I said at the microphone in Toronto. We really ought to move forward with "Tunnels in the Internet Architecture"
first so that other documents that discuss specific tunnel types can use it as a point of departure (if necessary).

So, let's have Tunnels in the Internet Architecture brought back onto the front burner first so that other documents that come later can use it as a normative reference.

Thanks - Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Int-area [mailto:int-area-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Suresh 
> Krishnan
> Sent: Monday, September 08, 2014 9:17 PM
> To: Internet Area
> Subject: [Int-area] (REVISED) Call for adoption of 
> draft-bonica-intarea-gre-mtu-06
> 
> Hi all,
>     This draft has been presented at intarea face to face meetings and 
> has received a bit of discussion. This call is being initiated to 
> determine whether there is WG consensus towards adoption of
> draft-bonica-intarea-gre-mtu-06 as an intarea WG draft. The draft is 
> available at
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-intarea-gre-mtu-06
> 
> Please state whether or not you're in favor of the adoption by 
> replying to this email. If you are not in favor, please also state 
> your objections in your response. This adoption call will complete on 2014-09-23.
> 
> Regards
> Suresh & Juan Carlos
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
Int-area@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email