IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-boucadair-intarea-host-identifier-scenarios-04

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Wed, 23 July 2014 12:12 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A5721A052E for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 05:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DIb6ejsrkYiC for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 05:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx11.netapp.com (mx11.netapp.com [216.240.18.76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 418E81A0648 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 05:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,717,1400050800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="136002717"
Received: from vmwexceht01-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.76.239]) by mx11-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 23 Jul 2014 05:12:03 -0700
Received: from HIOEXCMBX04-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.37) by vmwexceht01-prd.hq.netapp.com (10.106.76.239) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 05:11:59 -0700
Received: from HIOEXCMBX07-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.40) by hioexcmbx04-prd.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.847.32; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 05:11:58 -0700
Received: from HIOEXCMBX07-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([::1]) by hioexcmbx07-prd.hq.netapp.com ([fe80::8485:306a:80a6:ba8f%21]) with mapi id 15.00.0847.030; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 05:11:58 -0700
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Thread-Topic: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-boucadair-intarea-host-identifier-scenarios-04
Thread-Index: AQHPjA89VULaQL8SYEm1JGCv4zjXYpuuN8IAgAAEDwA=
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 12:11:57 +0000
Message-ID: <63BA73CC-B475-4AD7-9EC3-5D6716060A8D@netapp.com>
References: <CFC8AC41.41E79%alissa@cooperw.in> <E87B771635882B4BA20096B589152EF6287695E1@eusaamb107.ericsson.se> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93300396C7@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
In-Reply-To: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93300396C7@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
x-originating-ip: [10.120.60.37]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8FA1D8DA-25A3-406E-AE0B-DB8B99B90AE1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/yN6nSjmu6C_2SxOdF0cxwKJGN5k
Cc: Internet Area <int-area@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-boucadair-intarea-host-identifier-scenarios-04
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 12:12:06 -0000

Hi,

I wanted to repeat my comment from the meeting. Given that at least in my read of RFC6967, there exist to sane mechanism to even exchange host IDs across the network, I don't really see why INTAREA should spend any more time on this space. 

Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email