Re: [Internetgovtech] Guiding the Evolution of the IANA Protocol Parameter Registries

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 12 March 2014 21:14 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41D641A078A for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 14:14:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.048
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.048 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RWexBwe3bFR2 for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 14:13:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235991A0784 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 14:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1239; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1394658833; x=1395868433; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IBQp23Lb+Lkk6oRIOwYNPnOODGnr2suq2sbWDF9qQ/o=; b=hko8/dtEosbAVurMeFb8IzTn9DFYK06BF+k7LYvB+mVsbi50NLNUWrTc A8/AwaDzkgWYuXv0hNpW0Zc4RXmG80cj4EWBgqKV154jR2GLqq6PpO33C q2aD2EKqC9AIth8xGVg1LMV0b7dDbFSf9NOdPYfSN/G6fL/MapM2W+tB9 Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AigFAJvNIFOQ/khN/2dsb2JhbABZgwaEGL5SgSAWdIIlAQEBAwEjVQEFCwsODAIFFgsCAgkDAgECASsaBgEMAQcBAYdtCLFKoUgXgSmMW1gHgm+BSQEDmEWSLYFvgT88gSw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,641,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="8572320"
Received: from ams-core-4.cisco.com ([144.254.72.77]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Mar 2014 21:13:52 +0000
Received: from mctiny.local ([10.61.222.48]) by ams-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s2CLDpGi032636; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 21:13:52 GMT
Message-ID: <5320CE0F.1050003@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 22:13:51 +0100
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>, Steve Crocker <steve@shinkuro.com>
References: <53066F72.6080809@cisco.com> <CF2CB88C.1B2CA%alissa@cooperw.in> <53078600.3090104@cisco.com> <CF2CCDF6.1B3E7%alissa@cooperw.in> <53086568.7050707@cisco.com> <3FFD6830-DC12-4707-AE2B-0FE1F251B198@vigilsec.com> <530921E3.7060005@cisco.com> <DFC22E37-7FA1-4973-A804-73C00685419C@iab.org> <DF55C3B2-FF68-4001-B778-4CBC4354CAB6@iab.org> <39ED9EBA-C644-40A4-B45B-9764032CE277@apnic.net> <BA199E69-BA8D-4CFF-BEE4-DE444115C4D9@shinkuro.com> <0F0A2653-1FC8-475F-B123-01E96E26CECF@apnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <0F0A2653-1FC8-475F-B123-01E96E26CECF@apnic.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/internetgovtech/gpT2m4AsDl2o86EsnVkAxQenYUg
Cc: internetgovtech@iab.org, "ietf@ietf.org Mailing List" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] Guiding the Evolution of the IANA Protocol Parameter Registries
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 21:14:03 -0000

Geoff,

Thanks for your comments.  so that we understand what we are talking
about, here is the principle in question:

> The protocol parameters registries are provided as a public service.
>
> Directions for the creation of protocol parameter registries and the
> policies for subsequent additions and updates are specified in RFCs.
> The protocol parameters registries are available to everyone, and they
> are published in a form that allows their contents to be included in
> other works without further permission.  These works include, but are
> not limited to, implementations of Internet protocols and their
> associated documentation.

Your specific complaint is that we mention neither copyright or
trademark.  To me those two legal points are implementation of the above
principle.  We should do what is necessary to see that the parameters
are published so that all are free to use them.  Whether that implies
copyrights, trademarks, contracts, or what have you is for the lawyers
to sort.  What I like is that Steve is carrying forward in his words and
actions this idea that anyone can access this stuff, a point that he
worked with others to establish in the RFC series.  That's leadership!

Eliot