Re: [Internetgovtech] Guiding the Evolution of the IANA Protocol Parameter Registries

Pindar Wong <pindar.wong@gmail.com> Thu, 13 March 2014 05:47 UTC

Return-Path: <pindar.wong@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFFCA1A08E2 for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 22:47:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bJom3tBITMPJ for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 22:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x22b.google.com (mail-we0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F3DA1A08D6 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 22:47:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f171.google.com with SMTP id t61so403229wes.2 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 22:47:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=vDxo/on8JUZBcL/HNKMWQCBWfT8+b4kF4GSDBP7VjGY=; b=GdcAuEmgRKIqvaDYTB8IFBjUz2R2WINvn31YWS1duNk4MPbCNO58XgRrwg1MluCilP 6tPZzPss2sqC7pMT273emtI8niuYpIw11M+gLbwF1FEY3+HnNgwqSLIX5MRNKisToaoe 0xkwUA2Qb+6WeLAUtri0gOD3SWsxMHLM5giHdLr1sVo2vE5ocPkzo/hpZczfOuSffM1P 5+7tGWIZ8or3wQMEjz6IEFZ+TRgzlp8aaHtAAdlEtgJPIbQD8kQYHGYHDqm9d7Ifnjym WbC5oupMETc8MOBpK7WUZ9JUunl5j1b147VWYEu4SuuhlF+A4yIizrwn7hao0G3pPA4Y luTA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.58.180 with SMTP id s20mr13044wjq.54.1394689656035; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 22:47:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.0.228 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 22:47:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <532144E0.2080302@frobbit.se>
References: <53066F72.6080809@cisco.com> <CF2CB88C.1B2CA%alissa@cooperw.in> <53078600.3090104@cisco.com> <CF2CCDF6.1B3E7%alissa@cooperw.in> <53086568.7050707@cisco.com> <3FFD6830-DC12-4707-AE2B-0FE1F251B198@vigilsec.com> <530921E3.7060005@cisco.com> <DFC22E37-7FA1-4973-A804-73C00685419C@iab.org> <DF55C3B2-FF68-4001-B778-4CBC4354CAB6@iab.org> <39ED9EBA-C644-40A4-B45B-9764032CE277@apnic.net> <BA199E69-BA8D-4CFF-BEE4-DE444115C4D9@shinkuro.com> <0F0A2653-1FC8-475F-B123-01E96E26CECF@apnic.net> <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E633476A@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk> <3F12C9B5-61B6-4C28-B73A-320D80A6AE17@apnic.net> <532144E0.2080302@frobbit.se>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 13:47:35 +0800
Message-ID: <CAM7BtUoq9Rj-XLEmFOet5HMXv2NQrWQfExSnTSyTb5hZVJ7+qg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Pindar Wong <pindar.wong@gmail.com>
To: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b86cb68851fb604f4767d6d"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/internetgovtech/4keXud5hKByJT-lqqoa-06TR8dQ
Cc: internetgovtech@iab.org, Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>, l.wood@surrey.ac.uk, "ietf@ietf.org Mailing List" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] Guiding the Evolution of the IANA Protocol Parameter Registries
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 05:47:45 -0000

fwiw also be mindful of

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sui_generis_database_right

p.


On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se> wrote:

> On 2014-03-13 06:23, Geoff Huston wrote:
> > I personally am in favour of a stronger statement of principle from the
> IETF in this area, but I'm just one voice, and I sense from the posts for
> Jari and Eliot that they are unwilling to head further in this direction -
> fair enough.
>
> FWIW, I support Geoff here, given the history we have seen not only in
> direct IETF history but also in other Internet related registries (for
> example various TLD-registries).
>
> That said, I at the same time agree with Jari and Eliot that the over
> all goal is in the principles. That finding a solution "is implementation".
>
> So, I just would like to have a stronger statement so this is not
> forgotten.
>
> The copyright for a parameter and its assigments should stay with
> whatever organization "owns" that parameter. Not belong to whoever acts
> as the care taker of the registry.
>
> That ICANN also say they do not have any interest as the operator in IPR
> for the registry is good, but if the registry operator changes, IPR
> issues I absolutely would like to see in the agreement(s).
>
> I am because of that of course sort of happy with what Jari and Eliot
> stated. This can be found in the principles.
>
> Just do not forget about it...
>
>    Patrik
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internetgovtech mailing list
> Internetgovtech@iab.org
> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech
>
>