Re: [iola-conversion-tool] Bug in Datatracker Agenda Code?

Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> Mon, 05 March 2012 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-Original-To: iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3600421F8796 for <iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 07:30:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.512
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.512 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.088, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mWEAQnv3x8ut for <iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 07:30:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE6B21F8797 for <iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 07:30:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [2a01:3f0:1:0:21e:c2ff:fe13:7e3e] (port=63616 helo=brunello.netnod.se) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from <henrik@levkowetz.com>) id 1S4ZsD-0003nr-BL; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:30:53 +0100
Message-ID: <4F54DC2D.1000302@levkowetz.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:30:53 +0100
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexa Morris <amorris@amsl.com>
References: <8F28AC7A-8D1D-465C-A92B-DCC07197DADF@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <8F28AC7A-8D1D-465C-A92B-DCC07197DADF@amsl.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:3f0:1:0:21e:c2ff:fe13:7e3e
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: amorris@amsl.com, iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on grenache.tools.ietf.org)
Cc: iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [iola-conversion-tool] Bug in Datatracker Agenda Code?
X-BeenThere: iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the IOLA / DB Schema Conversion Tool Project <iola-conversion-tool.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iola-conversion-tool>, <mailto:iola-conversion-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/iola-conversion-tool>
List-Post: <mailto:iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iola-conversion-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iola-conversion-tool>, <mailto:iola-conversion-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 15:30:57 -0000

Hi Alexa,

On 2012-03-02 20:17 Alexa Morris said:
> There seems to be a small bug affecting Datatracker agenda code,
> because both the technical and the admin plenary agendas are being
> written to the same location.  I uploaded the admin agenda yesterday
> and then uploaded the technical plenary agenda, only to find that the
> technical plenary agenda went into the admin plenary slot. See here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/83/agenda.txt

I think this has been corrected now?  The materials upload tool is under
Ryan's control, but I think the problem was that the different slots had
been assigned to the same group ('ietf'), while the technical plenary
now has been changed to belong to 'iab'.

(This should, by the way, permit the IETF chair and the IAB chair to upload
agenda materials for these two sessions directly, without having to go
through the secretariat).

> Let me know if you need additional information to research this.

It would be good if you could confirm that with the current session
assignment, upload works for both and only appears in the appropriate
slot?


Best regards,

	Henrik