[iola-conversion-tool] Bug in discuss/comment email

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Wed, 15 February 2012 16:54 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91A6321E8067 for <iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:54:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zjnHKQT0ehUF for <iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:54:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B4C21F86E4 for <iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:54:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dn3-177.estacado.net (vicuna-alt.estacado.net []) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q1FGrxvl082832 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:54:01 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <4F3BE326.9050000@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:53:58 -0600
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@merlot.tools.ietf.org>, Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080603080901080707070807"
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Subject: [iola-conversion-tool] Bug in discuss/comment email
X-BeenThere: iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the IOLA / DB Schema Conversion Tool Project <iola-conversion-tool.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iola-conversion-tool>, <mailto:iola-conversion-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/iola-conversion-tool>
List-Post: <mailto:iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iola-conversion-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iola-conversion-tool>, <mailto:iola-conversion-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:54:07 -0000

Henrik, Ole -

Pete found a bug that he'll report separately, but I'd like to note I've 
reproduced it.

When adding a discuss to a document the mail that's generated is wrong 
(the subject line misses the discuss and the body doesn't have the 
discuss text. However the body says I entered a discuss.

This is something I tested before and didn't see a problem. There is an 
automated test that should have caught this too.



Subject: Robert Sparks' Discuss on draft-ietf-payload-rtp-klv-03: (with 

Robert Sparks has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-payload-rtp-klv-03: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


And a comment