IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Iot-directorate] IETF107 prep call agenda thoughts

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Fri, 06 March 2020 22:45 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: iot-directorate@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iot-directorate@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A83D63A0CB2 for <iot-directorate@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 14:45:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.888
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.888 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zUFUAllBrJFS for <iot-directorate@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 14:45:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB7A93A0CAC for <iot-directorate@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 14:45:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADFB13897D; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 17:44:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB41D10; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 17:45:30 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: =?utf-8?B?QXJpIEtlcsOkbmVu?= <ari.keranen@ericsson.com>
cc: IETF IoT Directorate <iot-directorate@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <F1F9A758-5C47-4087-AC69-B60B6D0F2D29@ericsson.com>
References: <5578.1582814676@localhost> <F1F9A758-5C47-4087-AC69-B60B6D0F2D29@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 25.1.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 17:45:30 -0500
Message-ID: <18010.1583534730@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iot-directorate/0fQaXOIJ7mpyIyQxO5Ob724dNds>
Subject: Re: [Iot-directorate] IETF107 prep call agenda thoughts
X-BeenThere: iot-directorate@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the IoT Directorate Members <iot-directorate.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iot-directorate>, <mailto:iot-directorate-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iot-directorate/>
List-Post: <mailto:iot-directorate@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iot-directorate-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-directorate>, <mailto:iot-directorate-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 22:45:34 -0000

Ari Keränen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com> wrote:
    > Since the IoT directorate does not have official liaisons with other
    > groups (IAB takes care of that) I called that agenda item "updates from
    > other IoT groups" instead of liaison.

Do you have the right people lined up to speak about each group?
So, one item I'd like to cover is whether or not we would like the IAB to
"take care of that"

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email