Re: [Iot-directorate] IETF107 prep call agenda thoughts

[Ari Keränen <[e-mail]>]

> On 10. Mar 2020, at 2.38, Michael Richardson <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Ari Keränen <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> Ari Keränen <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>> Since the IoT directorate does not have official liaisons with other
>>>> groups (IAB takes care of that) I called that agenda item "updates from
>>>> other IoT groups" instead of liaison.
>>> 
>>> Do you have the right people lined up to speak about each group?
>>> So, one item I'd like to cover is whether or not we would like the IAB to
>>> "take care of that"
> 
>> Given the short notice, I think it’s going to be best-effort reporting
>> this time. I know many directorate members are active in many of these
>> groups so we have at least some coverage, but I have not signed up
>> specific persons for the groups.
> 
>> If anyone would like to volunteer, please let me know (or put your name
>> in the Etherpad after the group names).
> 
> I've done that for IoTSF.
> I will write a paragraph to this list in the morning, and I'll post it to the
> IoTSF basecamp so they know what I'm saying.

Thanks!

> I hope we might have someone who can relate what CHIP is doing (I know
> nothing authoritative).  Ditto for OCF/Fairhair.

I asked Michael Koster to join who is well updated about many of the orgs on the list (CHIP, OneDM, IoT schema, etc.). 

Cheers,
Ari