Re: [Iot-directorate] [E] Re: IETF107 prep call agenda thoughts

Hi Ines,
Webex has a recording feature usually. This is an IETF Webex line.
Others can comment.

-Samita

On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 10:35 AM Ines Robles <mariainesrobles=
40googlemail.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Thank you for organizing this meeting.
>
> I kindly request if the meeting can be recorded, so in case that we can
> not attend, we can listen it later.  Do you think that it would be
> possible? :)
>
> Best regards,
>
> Ines.
>
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 5:13 PM Chakrabarti, Samita <samita.chakrabarti=
> 40verizon.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> Ari and I had a chat about the WG status part of the IOT-DIR call.
>> Although it takes up some time, the information sharing is quite useful for
>> the whole IOT-DIR members and now that the list is open to all, it is
>> definitely useful for the whole IOT community.
>>
>> However, in order to save some time, we will request the IOT WG chairs to
>> please update the respective WG status **before**  the pre-IETF IOT-DIR
>> call. The Etherpad information will be sent soon.
>> Then at the meeting, the WG chairs are encouraged to briefly talk about
>> only the highlights of the group or anything that requires IOT-DIR or other
>> IOT-WG chairs' attention.
>>
>> Hope that works for everyone.
>> -Samita
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 6:56 AM Ari Keränen <ari.keranen=
>> 40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Michael,
>>>
>>> Absolutely. That would be included into what I was referring to with
>>> "highlighting any issues that are of wider interest / require coordination
>>> across groups". I was hoping the WG/RG chairs would be up to date with
>>> things arriving, but of course anyone else with such information can chime
>>> in too. But indeed it's good to emphasize this aspect of the "status report
>>> slots".
>>>
>>> Did you have something specific in mind on how we should structure that
>>> part of the discussion?
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Ari
>>>
>>> On 26/02/2020, 22.39, "Iot-directorate on behalf of Michael Richardson"
>>> <iot-directorate-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>     Ari, thank you for arranging this call.
>>>
>>>     With the new, much more open structure, I wonder if updates from WG
>>> chairs is
>>>     really the best way.
>>>
>>>     It would be good to emphasize the places where WGs are seeing things
>>> arrive
>>>     which turn out to be out of their scope, but aren't sure where it
>>> goes.
>>>     Or, the opposite, where two WGs are convinced something is their
>>> business.
>>>
>>>
>>>     --
>>>     Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca
>>> <mcr%2BIETF@sandelman...ca>>, Sandelman Software Works
>>>      -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Iot-directorate mailing list
>>> Iot-directorate@ietf.org
>>>
>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_iot-2Ddirectorate&d=DwIGaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=pWMzx7FsqijEJPyfMBfn-HJss-wVVTf0K5y-cxCTXL8&m=g_L-6JzTNTfPkgXEio67zM9jxkels4hWS4k-kC9L06Q&s=HRoFOjxi8bPQ7e8mfG2ScZCvOl79ibE8MX1E8K80m2o&e=
>>>
>> --
>> Iot-directorate mailing list
>> Iot-directorate@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-directorate
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_iot-2Ddirectorate&d=DwMFaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=pWMzx7FsqijEJPyfMBfn-HJss-wVVTf0K5y-cxCTXL8&m=th_l3wfLmo-Fe7SUybx53H5m61mLaDEbP_PWRFeFWwc&s=_Q-ZVoE9NVH_7uTIslVhd5RvSbwksz4p_oqbX87ac4M&e=>
>>
>