Re: [Iot-directorate] [E] Re: IETF107 prep call agenda thoughts

Hi,

Thank you for organizing this meeting.

I kindly request if the meeting can be recorded, so in case that we can not
attend, we can listen it later.  Do you think that it would be possible? :)

Best regards,

Ines.

On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 5:13 PM Chakrabarti, Samita <samita.chakrabarti=
40verizon.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Ari and I had a chat about the WG status part of the IOT-DIR call.
> Although it takes up some time, the information sharing is quite useful for
> the whole IOT-DIR members and now that the list is open to all, it is
> definitely useful for the whole IOT community.
>
> However, in order to save some time, we will request the IOT WG chairs to
> please update the respective WG status **before**  the pre-IETF IOT-DIR
> call. The Etherpad information will be sent soon.
> Then at the meeting, the WG chairs are encouraged to briefly talk about
> only the highlights of the group or anything that requires IOT-DIR or other
> IOT-WG chairs' attention.
>
> Hope that works for everyone.
> -Samita
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 6:56 AM Ari Keränen <ari.keranen=
> 40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> Absolutely. That would be included into what I was referring to with
>> "highlighting any issues that are of wider interest / require coordination
>> across groups". I was hoping the WG/RG chairs would be up to date with
>> things arriving, but of course anyone else with such information can chime
>> in too. But indeed it's good to emphasize this aspect of the "status report
>> slots".
>>
>> Did you have something specific in mind on how we should structure that
>> part of the discussion?
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Ari
>>
>> On 26/02/2020, 22.39, "Iot-directorate on behalf of Michael Richardson" <
>> iot-directorate-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>     Ari, thank you for arranging this call.
>>
>>     With the new, much more open structure, I wonder if updates from WG
>> chairs is
>>     really the best way.
>>
>>     It would be good to emphasize the places where WGs are seeing things
>> arrive
>>     which turn out to be out of their scope, but aren't sure where it
>> goes.
>>     Or, the opposite, where two WGs are convinced something is their
>> business.
>>
>>
>>     --
>>     Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca <mcr%2BIETF@sandelman..ca>>,
>> Sandelman Software Works
>>      -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Iot-directorate mailing list
>> Iot-directorate@ietf.org
>>
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_iot-2Ddirectorate&d=DwIGaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=pWMzx7FsqijEJPyfMBfn-HJss-wVVTf0K5y-cxCTXL8&m=g_L-6JzTNTfPkgXEio67zM9jxkels4hWS4k-kC9L06Q&s=HRoFOjxi8bPQ7e8mfG2ScZCvOl79ibE8MX1E8K80m2o&e=
>>
> --
> Iot-directorate mailing list
> Iot-directorate@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-directorate
>