Re: [Iot-onboarding] [Secdispatch] DANE IOT proposed outcome

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Wed, 02 December 2020 23:19 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: iot-onboarding@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iot-onboarding@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42CF63A15F2; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 15:19:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sC_cy5hzOY7U; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 15:19:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F61A3A15E0; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 15:19:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (cpe788a207f397a-cmbc4dfb96bb50.sdns.net.rogers.com [174.116.121.43]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D6DE1F45D; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 23:19:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id D97B41A02BA; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 18:19:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from dooku (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D80021A026C; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 18:19:46 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: Eliot Lear <lear=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, iot-onboarding@ietf.org
Reply-to: iot-onboarding@ietf.org
cc: secdispatch@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <2786E31F-2A4F-4901-8ECC-7AEF4B4D81E2@cisco.com>
References: <2786E31F-2A4F-4901-8ECC-7AEF4B4D81E2@cisco.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Eliot Lear <lear=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> message dated "Mon, 16 Nov 2020 11:54:59 +0100."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 18:19:46 -0500
Message-ID: <694969.1606951186@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iot-onboarding/lCQfVB-TO8NmnzVHvqLdgiDDZ14>
Subject: Re: [Iot-onboarding] [Secdispatch] DANE IOT proposed outcome
X-BeenThere: iot-onboarding@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IoT onboarding mechanisms <iot-onboarding.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iot-onboarding>, <mailto:iot-onboarding-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iot-onboarding/>
List-Post: <mailto:iot-onboarding@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iot-onboarding-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-onboarding>, <mailto:iot-onboarding-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 23:19:53 -0000

Eliot Lear <lear=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
    > We also discussed a non-WG forming BOF to look at, as Ted put it, the
    > broader context for onboarding.  To give people a feel for the sort of
    > related work that is available, here are a list of related activities:

Hi, I was asked to reboot:
            Device Enrollment in IETF protocols -- A Roadmap
                 draft-richardson-enrollment-roadmap-03

as a place to keep track of all sorts of these efforts.
It had been turned into a wiki entry, but frankly, I hate trying to edit
stuff in a browser. (Wasn't WEBDAV supposed to solve this problem?)

I could add these two DANE documents into the roadmap, but frankly, I'm not
sure where they go.

-- 
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [ 
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [ 
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [