Re: [Iotops] Martin Duke's Block on charter-ietf-iotops-00-17: (with BLOCK)

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 03 February 2021 21:04 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: iotops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iotops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81D333A11AD; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 13:04:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vKj-3OKq2s1C; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 13:04:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F3EE3A1189; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 13:04:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1785; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1612386241; x=1613595841; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc: to:references; bh=mMJULFkGAzYwAoS7SLQShc98f5F8rye3QopY/c12rA8=; b=jTWW3yVXCSflHHcDkee9wWXoRSqlPm11o0+DyTcwStp5CsIu5NI2XhXx XSrf9yOrK75LqyfsIFnT/8Wqjtu1TCaiNOujVsWoE32xBuy3hkIf/cbzW UbKapx5NAW1TPEpPfxc0xJx7FNcLdhScggA2NakJYhXB/GNMQuzn8R0Xy U=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AcAAD2DhtglxbLJq1iHAEBAQEBAQcBARIBAQQEAQGBf?= =?us-ascii?q?QUBAQsBg3YBIxIxhECJBIhUmkeBfAQHAQEBCgMBAS8EAQGESgKBfSY2Bw4CA?= =?us-ascii?q?wEBAQMCAwEBAQEFAQEBAgEGBBQBAQEBAQEBAYZDhXMBAQEDASNWBQsLGCoCA?= =?us-ascii?q?lcGE4MmAYJmILBUdoEyhVmEaxCBOAGBUotsQYIAgREnHIJWPodXNIIsBIIng?= =?us-ascii?q?QeCF4EwkkKJSZw/gwSDKYE6lx8DH6MgsjODcgIEBgUCFoFdBSyBWTMaCBsVZ?= =?us-ascii?q?QGCPj4SGQ2OLQ4JjihAAzA3AgYBCQEBAwmMFQEB?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,399,1602547200"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="33188949"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 03 Feb 2021 21:03:57 +0000
Received: from ams3-vpn-dhcp4285.cisco.com (ams3-vpn-dhcp4285.cisco.com [10.61.80.188]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 113L3tH3014607 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 3 Feb 2021 21:03:56 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <5C0A8959-4C5F-46B7-8AD7-56627CFB9E47@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_14199FE4-65A3-455B-99F2-09000D13E5D8"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 22:03:54 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJKd1tJZQGaTOKrLGKxfap3aF55kEi+LJ6K=K6QN5JEXBw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>, iotops-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, iotops@ietf.org
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
References: <161237796111.9705.9707026334703340484@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJJuru4j85RUsTGCPB0yyHpLJyiDprFN2dJ92YJvGSwuiw@mail.gmail.com> <07A626EE-0A52-477E-A877-A9C3333CD8D5@cisco.com> <CALaySJKd1tJZQGaTOKrLGKxfap3aF55kEi+LJ6K=K6QN5JEXBw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.80.188, ams3-vpn-dhcp4285.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iotops/n7A8KpuWCTrw3KXpgj398NpruxQ>
Subject: Re: [Iotops] Martin Duke's Block on charter-ietf-iotops-00-17: (with BLOCK)
X-BeenThere: iotops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IOT Operations <iotops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iotops>, <mailto:iotops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iotops/>
List-Post: <mailto:iotops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iotops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iotops>, <mailto:iotops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 21:04:05 -0000


> On 3 Feb 2021, at 21:18, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
> 
>> To me this will be difficult.  The problem is that it will work when
>> we don’t see disparate incompatible architectures popping up in
>> different working groups where they don’t even know the other exists.
>> I am hoping that the result is also that the use cases for some of the
>> items in (1) will be more broadly laid out.  But again, I don’t know
>> how to measure that.
> 
> I can't speak for Martin, and I already have a Yes ballot here.  But
> what I would think appropriate would be for the working group to draft
> a report to the IESG summarizing what the group has accomplished.

That sounds quite reasonable.  This is definitely a horse of a different color.

Eliot