IETF Logo Mail Archive

[IPFIX] initial draft for RTP message transport in IPFIX

Hendrik Scholz <hs@123.org> Mon, 26 March 2012 08:46 UTC

Return-Path: <hs@123.org>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6182921F84DE for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 01:46:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6O0Uy9Q1Jt1s for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 01:46:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mo-p05-ob6.rzone.de (mo-p05-ob6.rzone.de [IPv6:2a01:238:20a:202:53f5::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5964121F84AA for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 01:46:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-RZG-AUTH: :JH8HfU+kYd9xQ6m0ynnj9hHxvZXYXks+pm8dQxa2PdmCs29qNiFcVPCDoyjkieY9bbqiT4QWmOnEENFFtAToAZ2VyaGx
X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05
Received: from [IPv6:2001:df8:0:16:a288:b4ff:fec4:e230] ([2001:df8:0:16:a288:b4ff:fec4:e230]) by smtp.strato.de (fruni mo49) (RZmta 28.2 AUTH) with ESMTPA id Y06e6fo2Q7p8cS for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:46:44 +0200 (MEST)
Message-ID: <4F702CF4.4040203@123.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:46:44 +0200
From: Hendrik Scholz <hs@123.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120310 Thunderbird/11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ipfix@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [IPFIX] initial draft for RTP message transport in IPFIX
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:46:51 -0000

Hi!

Some time ago I submitted an initial draft describing the transport
of RTP media stream (quality) information in IPFIX packets.

The announcement is here:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i-d-announce/current/msg42805.html
and the draft is named draft-scholz-ipfix-rtp-msg-00

I believe this is part of a larger set of documents, namely the
draft-trammell-ipfix-sip-msg draft and a third yet to be written 
correlation draft to map between SIP packets/sessions in IPFIX and the 
RTP media streams as described by the -rtp-msg draft.

I would like to get your feedback on the content, esp on the
transport of the media quality.
draft-wu-xrblock-rtcp-xr-quality-monitoring-08 has a mechanism
to convey the type of MOS, the calculation algorithm and the actual
values.
Should we use the same mechanism?

There is a list of open TODOs in section 12 of the document.

Cheers,
  Hendrik

-- 
Hendrik Scholz <hs@123.org>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email