IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] IPPM WG Status and Agenda for IETF 95 Buenos Aires

<nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com> Mon, 14 March 2016 12:51 UTC

Return-Path: <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC9312D5A8 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 05:51:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A_J5IJy3DDeu for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 05:51:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm10-vm0.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm10-vm0.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.91.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8B6012D9C1 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 05:51:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1457959887; bh=9xHuvUrepPUVThIlprtpcSF1O4CCrCEaTzgCQQ0tsSw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=P17ZxZK2Jxmb9udPoM41LSt9oFDuzC/ETJfyobRWVjMXpwBGv35VtpxOkBtUKkBMVONE9WFXOQlCul0ZSzH5cv1AjSDhhcXnJWLw3w2tLSaOWxk0bVZvX2NAhOTDhrdkHMY0XfO8iFfTadO/fFjHNFr5uPuoWdZhNMfx+XC8GD8eAWliHAaFXg8rXgO6wxhHW6AutcWKOdgvzvBOGtDTxLEmE/afdG0/2gFlEivwsOnf2wv7yaLd2yVkGvLslEMMWc7gYuU1KYUlPNU/f20tLPTl2CU21PhS+yLtyrK4R0xKZ3jmmW4FqgY2IHM1o7E9QMEXVZfye2HWghz0wlY19w==
Received: from [98.138.100.116] by nm10.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Mar 2016 12:51:27 -0000
Received: from [98.138.88.234] by tm107.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Mar 2016 12:51:27 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1034.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Mar 2016 12:51:27 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 168352.17118.bm@omp1034.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
X-YMail-OSG: yPq0xbEVM1nSnGR9IcWmWb5nUrHDr_zRM6PZfhsaec0WzlWAWVObGP_g0BdbEqF 5PhM9q8wsqv5zMgz9PYtEyYz1gkhX02OgtLeXRkgeiRW85mzOKLF9OaINEM6Tfn5ggOdaRd07jGB JZh1GOAwBABv5ZegKbgMnnR71u.sbsCNDUAGa_b2KXpYXSBaLzTlu0l.zZAue8qyBiKZM7U4MlSw Vd264UH83VaiK_MHDNL_Q5ONkMuCwPRNeKTLjMDz86LDFWxL4CizUGevnkwTk76XzWFvSz_U6X4Y hUiDW6vXRAR8VnO475VYOE_7lymNDyrj91PlE.iO56QoAIpTBktABPRR1bQecZRQLWwRHGDnRGKJ C2mawOK1AsD_qgFCP.Od.s4YrwCFEfBrj3kGTM7YFsKinDCig0pSvj7pwRpUbaUvihF7g4S6sUrx Py7Gd5ddgS9P_N_Dq8MKG8_plbCM1sz1KmwomXXN6OREeM_nh5LTEoAxxW8q..yu5lA2.N7eoZN_ RwVWu7cu7Q.pkQgqBPEzLnUI-
Received: by 98.138.101.168; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 12:51:26 +0000
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 12:51:25 +0000
From: nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com
To: "joachim.fabini@tuwien.ac.at" <joachim.fabini@tuwien.ac.at>, Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>
Message-ID: <1532830142.844245.1457959885118.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <56E67356.9020905@tuwien.ac.at>
References: <56E67356.9020905@tuwien.ac.at>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_844244_1886217552.1457959885114"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/0PCIR9Fvj0vU7GuHzifDWWjyabs>
Cc: "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ippm] IPPM WG Status and Agenda for IETF 95 Buenos Aires
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 12:51:30 -0000



>Although our draft is the initial trigger, my focus was on pointing out
>some extension to improve the proposed process.
>Some ippm drafts that do not gather large interest in the group may be
>of strategic importance to ippm.  

Guys, do we have other older RFCs which need IPv6 support (or something else) added?
Nalini

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email