Re: [ippm] WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-yang

Hi Tom,

Thanks very much for your comments. 
Please see inline.

Cheers,
Tianran
-----Original Message-----
From: ippm [mailto:ippm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of t petch
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2022 7:13 PM
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>; IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ippm] WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-yang

On 09/08/2022 17:15, Tommy Pauly wrote:
> Hello IPPM,
>
> This email starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-yang.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-yang/
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-yang-04.html
>
> Please review this document, and reply to this email to indicate your comments, and if you support publishing this document.

Not ready

no examples

ZTR> Yes, we need to add them in the appendix.

RFC8343, RFC9197 need adding to I-D refs

ZTR> Good capture. Thanks. I will add.

'Simplified BSD License' is out of date - should be Revised although it can be a challenge to get it there

ZTR> Yes, I will update the copy right.

YANG module has lower case 'must' - intended?

ZTR> No intention. I searched the document. All the lower case "must" are in the "description". Do you think they should be uppercase?

leaf profile-name
  length "1 .. max"
that is a very large number of characters

ZTR> This is an acceptable option by the early YANG doctor review. I actually cannot imagine what kind of limits we should apply. It's only clear that 0 should be excluded.  

Tom Petch

>
> The last call will go until Wednesday, August 31.
>
> Best,
> Tommy & Marcus
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>

_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
ippm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm