Re: [ippm] Call for adoption: draft-gandhi-ippm-twamp-srpm and draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-srpm

"li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com" <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com> Mon, 02 November 2020 06:37 UTC

Return-Path: <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBF723A0DFC; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 22:37:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.089
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.089 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hotmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xeQzQLFrSLei; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 22:37:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from APC01-SG2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092253043.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.253.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAF373A0DFB; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 22:37:47 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=hOmFFNoo1pmWejklhpW7bX/utL/I/pDWoIZkVP3/+OQZhBchJoKSoGXiNVdXwn1//x5WGCk4JXh2leH3qB0BiwiZn5KXLvZ75v9U46YNvXkhUcicQ/+NzJ0vfqA+/CP7Qnjut0DfT8nKrO+RmGX2AeGpQJ9LfMcc8Po1W8RftVWe68Wzx/NNjFH8MnVDYZLPRIm8Jxra9VzPF87U/wWSx8XDaNqdV8J/sXgwDJm/6vO9m3CC+od1qfTdgO8Nksq42kH8MoMj1rBN3DaCKSZIMd2PDfS/H2ANhOLBQIp0dlc1+NTfIPVbdZF29ZrJMZvpZr90/pkQTw9eGNLEUAPF4g==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=yPyYxgsnQWR3whnYSU5B40Gel63ALeFywRDifPdAuwM=; b=ZaaaSjIrrnKpH/GxLw+G0QF5qOrTGRbJUGa5g3sGEu9o2aNZasPCXSZgqqo7YVIKx8JvRsk+QdQBFr2GC36HmxptTtAs11SDzq6IVC3U4gCatdKuV8f+Y8zWnAjy/k8dGgn2IdmnmJqG1LdgPnHN2XZJJdxc+SPae1b+cihXW4PJpIlFICMbDyp6eywbijXw1swHBGBHAWHj2M89zdvbOC+5ijY5YIBte1S9jx/ylSioSSewKZR9xLXnvVAm5sAce7EHS7iFLvvuqbeR8gBi6xMgaMwlhG413Yi3FvL1FWg4iUkknF3mGeCGxi/ppSlk8YDV5Ysapd/2q5e9e3ad3Q==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=yPyYxgsnQWR3whnYSU5B40Gel63ALeFywRDifPdAuwM=; b=hvEyn7fesSe8BKAu3tpZ4TtlZBM+0jGswlm4+ZedFS3qchEpvYQzDV/EalUdBnOEEdi2M8BEWrD0bW80H93/GLZAkQJ+1pQFaWSHKopxAgs8PNRJL0JwJTPt5JVYS1qoz+asBxe1gwZ6BlXdsp6V01Eed0v/jdEkbVPV4Yyy7O3802hOZQDHse5b//Rdhs/FWd4VCzbmAneX9P+beEmHXXQZSPiFOHvkH0HcjScljYvt+7bCeOOlgK9LhPPAGfdTSMbU9psr+Zj860nq1NCN+z/RLzc7dPZnOqnz4XYMWE5LtRzmZImKdFWqV9WXwK1ThgIW+M52ReOYdwpdDb6K3g==
Received: from SG2APC01FT019.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7ebd::41) by SG2APC01HT047.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7ebd::313) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3520.15; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 06:37:35 +0000
Received: from MEYP282MB2022.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (10.152.250.58) by SG2APC01FT019.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.250.121) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3520.15 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 06:37:34 +0000
X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker: OriginalChecksum:A8E13F2031B2A2FED323CAF540BD5CA9133DFE1515AE5232A43152F9E8927ABA; UpperCasedChecksum:B89E5F44F00FAC0B5B9214665004894061D91EB40AEB7D51905FC72ABD6296BC; SizeAsReceived:8646; Count:46
Received: from MEYP282MB2022.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::a506:54c:167:69f8]) by MEYP282MB2022.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::a506:54c:167:69f8%6]) with mapi id 15.20.3499.030; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 06:37:34 +0000
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 14:38:13 +0800
From: "li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com" <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, ippm <ippm@ietf.org>
Cc: IPPM Chairs <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>, "spring-chairs@ietf.org" <spring-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <DB661053-5088-44C6-B2CF-AD97C6001C5F@apple.com>
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.9.156[cn]
Message-ID: <MEYP282MB20224AC0F1BCA9B355C09FE2FC100@MEYP282MB2022.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart725185173231_=----"
X-TMN: [4h5AkgBGUfze2fuVfO7JbZiP7+AkRdzZ]
X-ClientProxiedBy: HKAPR03CA0011.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:203:c8::16) To MEYP282MB2022.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10c6:220:b4::7)
X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <2020110214380987467528@hotmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Received: from cmcc-PC (183.243.255.33) by HKAPR03CA0011.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:203:c8::16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_1, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id 15.20.3541.10 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 06:37:33 +0000
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-IncomingHeaderCount: 46
X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 270e9759-86a1-4bd3-8d3a-08d87ef9c841
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: SG2APC01HT047:
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: n6+BXax60/SwQfTxfzTHt/YMmHQiDpvkZy1Dw6hugm0dsQFDwpYR3FA1rfRw6ruzv24L7SkRxNsyHjrP10CC55lSmL0jlSXTkaReGMlOdXeXuDbp+0Ahi9Ie3qaVGzkEeNzsTzIViALjFB7AH+Ib7BvDO3u2fWtC84yrUl7tUxBZRLWBvBS/EKQOHxjaa5AwuDiteja+Gh5r7sKZ956tmGCG08BY6fWAjXICopdYUDW1dw+6DaZASzI6gd7jAB3T
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: w9CtZqbBsWbBwFyW7p5yjr76Nr/CvIy+86tH3EcrXZRfEOuhoSgT7AULnPjGLtkbS9TVSkPOpC5SbKCJqduNmZoIl4iCoHiifL1+q5VGEQVfIC24XWAgPpidD5ssBZ3y2mCx0qJunvq1ZyNr3d9lew==
X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 270e9759-86a1-4bd3-8d3a-08d87ef9c841
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Nov 2020 06:37:34.8603 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: SG2APC01FT019.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SG2APC01HT047
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/HTw68MqnQzZH6VYlmxea7bBrLlw>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Call for adoption: draft-gandhi-ippm-twamp-srpm and draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-srpm
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 06:37:50 -0000

Dear All,

I've read the docs and support the adoption for both of them with the following comments.

For section 3.2, there are no Receive Counter, Sender Counter, nor Sender Sequence Number defined here. I believe the texts describe these parameters should be put in section 4.1.
I think it is better to expain how the counters and sequence numbers are used to do loss measurement. 

Best Regards,
Zhenqiang Li


li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com
 
From: Tommy Pauly
Date: 2020-10-31 02:34
To: IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org)
CC: IPPM Chairs; spring-chairs
Subject: [ippm] Call for adoption: draft-gandhi-ippm-twamp-srpm and draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-srpm
Hello IPPM,

For the past few meetings, we’ve had updates on the work in the SPRING WG that was using STAMP and TWAMP. Since those documents ended up making extensions to the base protocols, the chairs of SPRING and IPPM decided that it would be best to split the documents and track the IPPM extension work in the IPPM WG.

As such, we are starting a Working Group call for adoption for draft-gandhi-ippm-twamp-srpm and draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-srpm.

The documents are here:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-srpm-00
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-ippm-twamp-srpm-00

The related SPRING documents are here:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-03
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-twamp-srpm-11

Please provide your feedback on these documents, and state whether or not you believe the IPPM WG should adopt this work by replying to this email. Please provide your feedback by the start of the IETF 109 meeting week, on Monday, November 16.

Best,
Tommy & Ian