IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] Call for adoption: draft-gandhi-ippm-twamp-srpm and draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-srpm

"Chengli (Cheng Li)" <c.l@huawei.com> Tue, 17 November 2020 08:44 UTC

Return-Path: <c.l@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC7C3A09C6; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:44:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2jw0Mcd7XVz0; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:44:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 072533A09C0; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:44:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fraeml705-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.207]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4CZzvg5fCyz67F47; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:42:07 +0800 (CST)
Received: from fraeml705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.54) by fraeml705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.54) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1913.5; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:44:18 +0100
Received: from DGGEML423-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.40) by fraeml705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.54) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA_P256) id 15.1.1913.5 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:44:17 +0100
Received: from DGGEML529-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.220]) by dggeml423-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.1.199.40]) with mapi id 14.03.0487.000; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:44:12 +0800
From: "Chengli (Cheng Li)" <c.l@huawei.com>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org)" <ippm@ietf.org>
CC: IPPM Chairs <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>, "spring-chairs@ietf.org" <spring-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [ippm] Call for adoption: draft-gandhi-ippm-twamp-srpm and draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-srpm
Thread-Index: AQGKoOKFYMy1u9FpGBTWyX9fi5E/sqpkOSNA
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 08:44:12 +0000
Message-ID: <C7C2E1C43D652C4E9E49FE7517C236CB02CBE96F@dggeml529-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <DB661053-5088-44C6-B2CF-AD97C6001C5F@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <DB661053-5088-44C6-B2CF-AD97C6001C5F@apple.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.108.243.130]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C7C2E1C43D652C4E9E49FE7517C236CB02CBE96Fdggeml529mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/NkR0XgJOBePiUMdEDMtLhCYIbbI>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Call for adoption: draft-gandhi-ippm-twamp-srpm and draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-srpm
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 08:44:28 -0000

Hi IPPM,

I support the adoption with some questions and comments.

draft-gandhi-ippm-twamp-srpm-00

1.       Is draft-gandhi-ippm-twamp-srpm-00 an Informational draft?

2.       Do not require any IANA allocation? Related to 1.

3.       The name is about TWAMP Light, but in draft short name , it is twamp.

4.       Can we use this method for other network except SR? I think yes.

draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-srpm-00

1.       Can we use this method for other network except SR? I think yes.

Thanks,
Cheng




From: Tommy Pauly [mailto:tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org]
Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2020 3:35 AM
To: IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org) <ippm@ietf.org>
Cc: IPPM Chairs <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>; spring-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [ippm] Call for adoption: draft-gandhi-ippm-twamp-srpm and draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-srpm

Hello IPPM,

For the past few meetings, we’ve had updates on the work in the SPRING WG that was using STAMP and TWAMP. Since those documents ended up making extensions to the base protocols, the chairs of SPRING and IPPM decided that it would be best to split the documents and track the IPPM extension work in the IPPM WG.

As such, we are starting a Working Group call for adoption for draft-gandhi-ippm-twamp-srpm and draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-srpm.

The documents are here:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-srpm-00
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-ippm-twamp-srpm-00

The related SPRING documents are here:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-03
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-twamp-srpm-11

Please provide your feedback on these documents, and state whether or not you believe the IPPM WG should adopt this work by replying to this email. Please provide your feedback by the start of the IETF 109 meeting week, on Monday, November 16.

Best,
Tommy & Ian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email